Skipping breakfast is associated with overweight and obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis

超重 医学 荟萃分析 肥胖 优势比 队列研究 观察研究 置信区间 队列 横断面研究 腹部肥胖 内科学 代谢综合征 病理
作者
Xiumei Ma,Qing Chen,Yueli Pu,Man Guo,Zongzhe Jiang,Wei Huang,Yang Long,Yong Xu
出处
期刊:Obesity Research & Clinical Practice [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:14 (1): 1-8 被引量:205
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.orcp.2019.12.002
摘要

In recent years, many original studies have shown that skipping breakfast has been associated with overweight and obesity; however, the results of different studies are inconsistent. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies to synthesize the associations between skipping breakfast and the risk of overweight/ obesity. We did a systematic search using Pubmed, and Ovid searched up to August 2019. Observational studies (cohort studies and cross-sectional studies) reporting adjusted Odds Ratio or Risk Ratio estimates for the association between breakfast skipping and overweight/obesity (including abdominal obesity). Summary odds ratio (or Risk Ratio) and 95% confidence intervals calculated with a random-effects model. 45 observational studies (36 cross-sectional studies and 9 cohort studies) were included in this meta-analysis. In cross-sectional studies, The ORs of low frequency breakfast intake per week versus high frequency were 1.48 (95% CI 1.40–1.57; I2 = 54.0%; P = 0.002) for overweight/obesity, 1.31 (95% CI 1.17–1.47; I2 = 43.0%; P = 0.15) for abdominal obesity. In cohort studies, The RR of low-frequency breakfast intake per week versus high frequency was 1.44 (95% CI 1.25–1.66; I2 = 61%; P = 0.009) for overweight/obesity. This meta-analysis confirmed that skipping breakfast is associated with overweight/obesity, and skipping breakfast increases the risk of overweight/obesity. The results of cohort studies and cross-sectional studies are consistent. There is no significant difference in these results among different ages, gender, regions, and economic conditions.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
风净沙发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
雷雷雷发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
在水一方应助听南采纳,获得10
1秒前
2秒前
MOMO完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
小二郎应助jeff采纳,获得10
4秒前
lhhhh发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
ZZzz发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
酷波er应助糖糖采纳,获得10
4秒前
浩川发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
思源应助朴实的面包采纳,获得10
6秒前
dara997发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
bingsu108完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
realha发布了新的文献求助30
12秒前
烟花应助ZZzz采纳,获得10
13秒前
13秒前
充电宝应助雷雷雷采纳,获得10
14秒前
khuongthuy完成签到,获得积分20
14秒前
笑声像鸭子叫完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
俭朴酒窝完成签到,获得积分20
14秒前
14秒前
秋子骞完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
雨石发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
16秒前
16秒前
壮壮关注了科研通微信公众号
17秒前
认真涵蕾完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
lccw完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
18秒前
AtGaP发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
18秒前
尤野发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
19秒前
haha发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
20秒前
发嗲的炳完成签到,获得积分20
21秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Social Cognition: Understanding People and Events 1000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6029484
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7700298
关于积分的说明 16190464
捐赠科研通 5176695
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2770200
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1753531
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1639248