应对(心理学)
认知评价
2型糖尿病
心理学
自我管理
糖尿病管理
心理信息
糖尿病
临床心理学
医学
梅德林
政治学
计算机科学
机器学习
内分泌学
法学
作者
Cynthia A. Berg,Vicki S. Helgeson,Eunjin Lee Tracy,Jonathan Butner,Caitlin S. Kelly,Meredith Van Vleet,Michelle L. Litchman
出处
期刊:Health Psychology
[American Psychological Association]
日期:2020-05-07
卷期号:39 (8): 689-699
被引量:33
摘要
Objective Dyadic coping theories posit that spousal involvement may benefit illness management through collaborative and supportive (CS 52.3% female; spouses = 46.40, 47.5% female) completed a 14-day diary assessing illness appraisals (ranging from nonshared through shared) and spouses' C&S strategies. Patients reported daily self-regulation failures, self-care behaviors, and perceived coping effectiveness. Daily blood glucose was gathered from glucometers. Results Multilevel models indicated both within-person and between-person effects of patients' and spouses' illness appraisals on C&S strategies with higher shared illness appraisals associated with greater C&S strategies. Greater shared illness appraisals were associated with fewer self-regulation failures and better self-care. C&S strategies were associated with lower self-care and higher blood glucose levels. Appraisal interacted with C&S strategies such that C&S strategies were associated with more self-regulation failures, lower self-care, and lower perceived coping effectiveness when patients reported lower shared appraisals. Conclusions Results suggest that C&S strategies may be more detrimental for diabetes management when individuals view diabetes as less shared. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI