医学
血友病
孵化
血友病B
因子IX
效价
血友病A
潜伏期
内科学
免疫学
儿科
病毒
生物
生物化学
作者
Mervyn A. Sahud,Olga S. Zhukov,Stanley J. Naides,Cynthia Serrano,Edward C.C. Wong,Jeffrey S. Dlott,Frederick Racke
出处
期刊:Haemophilia
[Wiley]
日期:2020-05-18
卷期号:26 (4): 735-740
摘要
Abstract Introduction The time‐dependent nature of factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors is well described, and the standard FVIII Bethesda assay used to measure inhibitors incorporates a 2‐hour incubation. Despite case reports and reviews describing the immediate‐acting nature of factor IX (FIX) inhibitors, many coagulation laboratories continue to use a traditional prolonged incubation for FIX Bethesda assays. To our knowledge, a comprehensive evaluation of the FIX Bethesda assay without incubation has not been reported. Aim The goal of this study was to evaluate the performance of a rapid FIX Bethesda (ie no incubation) compared with the standard Bethesda assay (2‐hour incubation). Methods The analysis used a Bethesda assay configured for either immediate testing or a 2‐hour incubation. Samples from 14 haemophilia B patients with inhibitors and 9 non‐human controls were tested. Results The two assays yielded similar performance overall. The average per cent difference in inhibitor titre between the rapid and standard FIX Bethesda assay was −3% (range −15% to +13%; P = .175) for patient samples and −2% (range −17% to +14%; P = .376) for controls. Conclusion The rapid Bethesda assay showed good agreement with the standard Bethesda assay for determination of inhibitor levels in patients with severe haemophilia B. The rapid assay allows for faster assessment of inhibitors in patients with severe haemophilia B and has the potential to improve the ability of the coagulation laboratory to perform testing from a logistical viewpoint. Further studies involving larger numbers of patients would be important to confirm our findings.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI