Machine Learning Approach to Stratifying Prognosis Relative to Tumor Burden after Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases: An International Cohort Analysis.

四分位间距 医学 队列 内科学 总体生存率 肿瘤科 肝切除术 放射科
作者
Alessandro Paro,Madison J Hyer,Diamantis I Tsilimigras,Alfredo Guglielmi,Andrea Ruzzenente,Sorin Alexandrescu,George Poultsides,Federico Aucejo,Jordan M Cloyd,Timothy M Pawlik
出处
期刊:Journal of The American College of Surgeons [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:234 (4): 504-513
标识
DOI:10.1097/xcs.0000000000000094
摘要

Assessing overall tumor burden on the basis of tumor number and size may assist in prognostic stratification of patients after resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). We sought to define the prognostic accuracy of tumor burden by using machine learning (ML) algorithms compared with other commonly used prognostic scoring systems.Patients who underwent hepatectomy for CRLM between 2001 and 2018 were identified from a multi-institutional database and split into training and validation cohorts. ML was used to define tumor burden (ML-TB) based on CRLM tumor number and size thresholds associated with 5-year overall survival. Prognostic ability of ML-TB was compared with the Fong and Genetic and Morphological Evaluation scores using Cohen's d.Among 1,344 patients who underwent resection of CRLM, median tumor number (2, interquartile range 1 to 3) and size (3 cm, interquartile range 2.0 to 5.0) were comparable in the training (n = 672) vs validation (n = 672) cohorts; patient age (training 60.8 vs validation 61.0) and preoperative CEA (training 10.2 ng/mL vs validation 8.3 ng/mL) was also similar (p > 0.05). ML empirically derived optimal cutoff thresholds for number of lesions (3) and size of the largest lesion (1.3 cm) in the training cohort, which were then used to categorize patients in the validation cohort into 3 prognostic groups. Patients with low, average, or high ML-TB had markedly different 5-year overall survival (51.6%, 40.9%, and 23.1%, respectively; p < 0.001). ML-TB was more effective at stratifying patients relative to 5-year overall survival (low vs high ML-TB, d = 2.73) vs the Fong clinical (d = 1.61) or Genetic and Morphological Evaluation (d = 0.84) scores.Using a large international cohort, ML was able to stratify patients into 3 distinct prognostic categories based on overall tumor burden. ML-TB was noted to be superior to other CRLM prognostic scoring systems.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
PEI发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
Dawn完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
乐乐应助山眠枕月采纳,获得20
刚刚
鸭梨发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
河洛伊发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
王11完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
1秒前
小二郎应助seventh采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
科研通AI6.2应助王双采纳,获得10
1秒前
CodeCraft应助bobo采纳,获得10
2秒前
小左发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
隐形曼青应助乆乆乆乆采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
liu发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
Hello应助888采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
Cdragon发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
fjhsg25发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
yyyyy发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
好人应助墨白采纳,获得10
5秒前
小妖怪给小妖怪的求助进行了留言
5秒前
六六发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
海贵完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
英勇冰淇淋完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
开心的皮皮虾完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
Sara_123发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
yumin发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
ahey完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
思源应助hhh17采纳,获得30
8秒前
喻修杰完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
汉堡包应助小虾米采纳,获得10
8秒前
9秒前
yee完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
cc2941发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
刘鑫慧发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
忧郁发卡完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
高分求助中
Inorganic Chemistry Eighth Edition 1200
Standards for Molecular Testing for Red Cell, Platelet, and Neutrophil Antigens, 7th edition 1000
HANDBOOK OF CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS 106th edition 1000
ASPEN Adult Nutrition Support Core Curriculum, Fourth Edition 1000
The Psychological Quest for Meaning 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
脑电大模型与情感脑机接口研究--郑伟龙 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6303230
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8119991
关于积分的说明 17004527
捐赠科研通 5363168
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2848457
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1825937
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1679751