Machine Learning Approach to Stratifying Prognosis Relative to Tumor Burden after Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases: An International Cohort Analysis.

四分位间距 医学 队列 内科学 总体生存率 肿瘤科 肝切除术 放射科
作者
Alessandro Paro,Madison J Hyer,Diamantis I Tsilimigras,Alfredo Guglielmi,Andrea Ruzzenente,Sorin Alexandrescu,George Poultsides,Federico Aucejo,Jordan M Cloyd,Timothy M Pawlik
出处
期刊:Journal of The American College of Surgeons [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:234 (4): 504-513
标识
DOI:10.1097/xcs.0000000000000094
摘要

Assessing overall tumor burden on the basis of tumor number and size may assist in prognostic stratification of patients after resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). We sought to define the prognostic accuracy of tumor burden by using machine learning (ML) algorithms compared with other commonly used prognostic scoring systems.Patients who underwent hepatectomy for CRLM between 2001 and 2018 were identified from a multi-institutional database and split into training and validation cohorts. ML was used to define tumor burden (ML-TB) based on CRLM tumor number and size thresholds associated with 5-year overall survival. Prognostic ability of ML-TB was compared with the Fong and Genetic and Morphological Evaluation scores using Cohen's d.Among 1,344 patients who underwent resection of CRLM, median tumor number (2, interquartile range 1 to 3) and size (3 cm, interquartile range 2.0 to 5.0) were comparable in the training (n = 672) vs validation (n = 672) cohorts; patient age (training 60.8 vs validation 61.0) and preoperative CEA (training 10.2 ng/mL vs validation 8.3 ng/mL) was also similar (p > 0.05). ML empirically derived optimal cutoff thresholds for number of lesions (3) and size of the largest lesion (1.3 cm) in the training cohort, which were then used to categorize patients in the validation cohort into 3 prognostic groups. Patients with low, average, or high ML-TB had markedly different 5-year overall survival (51.6%, 40.9%, and 23.1%, respectively; p < 0.001). ML-TB was more effective at stratifying patients relative to 5-year overall survival (low vs high ML-TB, d = 2.73) vs the Fong clinical (d = 1.61) or Genetic and Morphological Evaluation (d = 0.84) scores.Using a large international cohort, ML was able to stratify patients into 3 distinct prognostic categories based on overall tumor burden. ML-TB was noted to be superior to other CRLM prognostic scoring systems.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
hwen1998发布了新的文献求助20
1秒前
善学以致用应助失眠的莺采纳,获得10
1秒前
jj发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
敏敏完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
酷波er应助123采纳,获得10
2秒前
WuchangI完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
GehaoZhang发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
ewasxz完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
天天快乐应助努力地小夏采纳,获得10
4秒前
柔弱紫发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
yuxing应助Wangyan采纳,获得30
5秒前
英俊的铭应助Wangyan采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
8秒前
蓝天发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
jj完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
xiaoxiaoxi应助ark861023采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
可爱的函函应助maoxinnan采纳,获得10
9秒前
11秒前
子勿语完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
多边形发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
茉莉完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
西西完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
SciGPT应助天衣无缝采纳,获得10
12秒前
学术欲望不断膨胀完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
打打应助烂漫的从彤采纳,获得10
13秒前
如花_HuaHua发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
不能在吃了完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
无花果干真好吃完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
123发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
丘比特应助ppsparkling采纳,获得10
15秒前
缥缈的松鼠完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
orixero应助godblessyou采纳,获得10
17秒前
内向的语雪完成签到,获得积分20
17秒前
高分求助中
The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Diachronic and Historical Linguistics 3000
HANDBOOK OF CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS 106th edition 1000
ASPEN Adult Nutrition Support Core Curriculum, Fourth Edition 1000
AnnualResearch andConsultation Report of Panorama survey and Investment strategy onChinaIndustry 1000
Decentring Leadership 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
GMP in Practice: Regulatory Expectations for the Pharmaceutical Industry 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6286723
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8105478
关于积分的说明 16952568
捐赠科研通 5352060
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2844237
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1821614
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1677853