Machine Learning Approach to Stratifying Prognosis Relative to Tumor Burden after Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases: An International Cohort Analysis.

四分位间距 医学 队列 内科学 总体生存率 肿瘤科 肝切除术 放射科
作者
Alessandro Paro,Madison J Hyer,Diamantis I Tsilimigras,Alfredo Guglielmi,Andrea Ruzzenente,Sorin Alexandrescu,George Poultsides,Federico Aucejo,Jordan M Cloyd,Timothy M Pawlik
出处
期刊:Journal of The American College of Surgeons [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:234 (4): 504-513
标识
DOI:10.1097/xcs.0000000000000094
摘要

Assessing overall tumor burden on the basis of tumor number and size may assist in prognostic stratification of patients after resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). We sought to define the prognostic accuracy of tumor burden by using machine learning (ML) algorithms compared with other commonly used prognostic scoring systems.Patients who underwent hepatectomy for CRLM between 2001 and 2018 were identified from a multi-institutional database and split into training and validation cohorts. ML was used to define tumor burden (ML-TB) based on CRLM tumor number and size thresholds associated with 5-year overall survival. Prognostic ability of ML-TB was compared with the Fong and Genetic and Morphological Evaluation scores using Cohen's d.Among 1,344 patients who underwent resection of CRLM, median tumor number (2, interquartile range 1 to 3) and size (3 cm, interquartile range 2.0 to 5.0) were comparable in the training (n = 672) vs validation (n = 672) cohorts; patient age (training 60.8 vs validation 61.0) and preoperative CEA (training 10.2 ng/mL vs validation 8.3 ng/mL) was also similar (p > 0.05). ML empirically derived optimal cutoff thresholds for number of lesions (3) and size of the largest lesion (1.3 cm) in the training cohort, which were then used to categorize patients in the validation cohort into 3 prognostic groups. Patients with low, average, or high ML-TB had markedly different 5-year overall survival (51.6%, 40.9%, and 23.1%, respectively; p < 0.001). ML-TB was more effective at stratifying patients relative to 5-year overall survival (low vs high ML-TB, d = 2.73) vs the Fong clinical (d = 1.61) or Genetic and Morphological Evaluation (d = 0.84) scores.Using a large international cohort, ML was able to stratify patients into 3 distinct prognostic categories based on overall tumor burden. ML-TB was noted to be superior to other CRLM prognostic scoring systems.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
wzy完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
玉洁完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
blueblue完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
忐忑的阑香完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
xqk发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
leizhou发布了新的文献求助20
2秒前
Bowen发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
孤独苡发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
zhangdamiao发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
dch完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
枫威发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
小不遛w完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
CipherSage应助顷梦采纳,获得10
4秒前
5秒前
YAN发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
等待的平凡完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
xuanggu发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
包觅风完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
qingzhiwu发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
眼睛大映阳完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
思源应助天真的万声采纳,获得10
8秒前
plm发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
Soyuu完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
天天快乐应助cc采纳,获得10
9秒前
10秒前
科研通AI6.3应助wyt采纳,获得10
10秒前
科研通AI6.2应助木木楷采纳,获得10
11秒前
在水一方应助善良水池采纳,获得10
12秒前
星辰大海应助黎小静采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
张雅琪发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
云中子发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
zhtgang完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
xqk完成签到,获得积分20
13秒前
ytong完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
王伟发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 5000
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 3000
Feldspar inclusion dating of ceramics and burnt stones 1000
What is the Future of Psychotherapy in a Digital Age? 801
The Psychological Quest for Meaning 800
Digital and Social Media Marketing 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5982791
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7378862
关于积分的说明 16029304
捐赠科研通 5123045
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2749260
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1719367
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1625589