矛盾心理
纯素饮食
动物权利
社会心理学
心理学
动物伦理
归属
显著性(神经科学)
吸引力
动物福利
感知
环境伦理学
社会学
医学
生物
内科学
哲学
神经科学
认知心理学
生态学
精神分析
作者
Ben De Groeve,Daniel L. Rosenfeld,Brent Bleys,Liselot Hudders
出处
期刊:Appetite
[Elsevier]
日期:2022-07-01
卷期号:174: 106006-106006
被引量:22
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2022.106006
摘要
Ambivalent attitudes exist toward vegans: While people may admire vegans' moral aims and commitment, they may also derogate vegans for seeming arrogant and overcommitted. These latter negative perceptions may undermine the effectiveness of efforts to reduce meat consumption for health, animal-welfare, and sustainability benefits. In the present research, we investigated the role of a vegan's motivation (animal ethics vs. health) in moralized attitudes toward vegans among omnivorous participants through two preregistered studies. In Study 1 (N = 390), we found that a vegan advocate motivated by animal ethics (vs. health) was seen as more moral but not as more arrogantly overcommitted. In Study 2 (N = 1177), we found that animal ethics (vs. health) vegans were seen as both more arrogantly committed and more morally committed, but that relative moral commitment perceptions were attenuated when vegans were described as actively advocating. Both advocating (vs. non-advocating) vegans and animal ethics (vs. health) vegans were generally seen as less socially attractive by omnivores due to stronger attributions of arrogant overcommitment, and a lower social attractiveness was associated with a lower willingness to eat less animal products. Our findings inform ongoing debates within the vegan movement about the effectiveness of signaling moral commitment in promoting plant-based diets.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI