亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Artificial Intelligence–Assisted Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

结肠镜检查 医学 无症状的 随机对照试验 结直肠癌 腺瘤 内科学 人口 胃肠病学 癌症 环境卫生
作者
Hong Xu,Raymond S. Tang,Thomas Y. Lam,Guijun Zhao,James Lau,Yunpeng Liu,Qi Wu,Long Rong,Weiran Xu,Xue Li,Sunny H. Wong,Shuntian Cai,Jing Wang,Guanyi Liu,Tantan Ma,Xiong Liang,Joyce Wing Yan Mak,Hongzhi Xu,Peng Yuan,Tingting Cao,Fudong Li,Zhenshi Ye,Zhang Shu-tian,Joseph J.�Y. Sung
出处
期刊:Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology [Elsevier]
卷期号:21 (2): 337-346.e3 被引量:81
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006
摘要

Background and AimsArtificial intelligence (AI)–assisted colonoscopy improves polyp detection and characterization in colonoscopy. However, data from large-scale multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCT) in an asymptomatic population are lacking.MethodsThis multicenter RCT aimed to compare AI-assisted colonoscopy with conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection in an asymptomatic population. Asymptomatic subjects 45–75 years of age undergoing colorectal cancer screening by direct colonoscopy or fecal immunochemical test were recruited in 6 referral centers in Hong Kong, Jilin, Inner Mongolia, Xiamen, and Beijing. In the AI-assisted colonoscopy, an AI polyp detection system (Eagle-Eye) with real-time notification on the same monitor of the endoscopy system was used. The primary outcome was overall adenoma detection rate (ADR). Secondary outcomes were mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy, ADR according to endoscopist’s experience, and colonoscopy withdrawal time. This study received Institutional Review Board approval (CRE-2019.393).ResultsFrom November 2019 to August 2021, 3059 subjects were randomized to AI-assisted colonoscopy (n = 1519) and conventional colonoscopy (n = 1540). Baseline characteristics and bowel preparation quality between the 2 groups were similar. The overall ADR (39.9% vs 32.4%; P < .001), advanced ADR (6.6% vs 4.9%; P = .041), ADR of expert (42.3% vs 32.8%; P < .001) and nonexpert endoscopists (37.5% vs 32.1%; P = .023), and adenomas per colonoscopy (0.59 ± 0.97 vs 0.45 ± 0.81; P < .001) were all significantly higher in the AI-assisted colonoscopy. The median withdrawal time (8.3 minutes vs 7.8 minutes; P = .004) was slightly longer in the AI-assisted colonoscopy group.ConclusionsIn this multicenter RCT in asymptomatic patients, AI-assisted colonoscopy improved overall ADR, advanced ADR, and ADR of both expert and nonexpert attending endoscopists. (ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT04422548). Artificial intelligence (AI)–assisted colonoscopy improves polyp detection and characterization in colonoscopy. However, data from large-scale multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCT) in an asymptomatic population are lacking. This multicenter RCT aimed to compare AI-assisted colonoscopy with conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection in an asymptomatic population. Asymptomatic subjects 45–75 years of age undergoing colorectal cancer screening by direct colonoscopy or fecal immunochemical test were recruited in 6 referral centers in Hong Kong, Jilin, Inner Mongolia, Xiamen, and Beijing. In the AI-assisted colonoscopy, an AI polyp detection system (Eagle-Eye) with real-time notification on the same monitor of the endoscopy system was used. The primary outcome was overall adenoma detection rate (ADR). Secondary outcomes were mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy, ADR according to endoscopist’s experience, and colonoscopy withdrawal time. This study received Institutional Review Board approval (CRE-2019.393). From November 2019 to August 2021, 3059 subjects were randomized to AI-assisted colonoscopy (n = 1519) and conventional colonoscopy (n = 1540). Baseline characteristics and bowel preparation quality between the 2 groups were similar. The overall ADR (39.9% vs 32.4%; P < .001), advanced ADR (6.6% vs 4.9%; P = .041), ADR of expert (42.3% vs 32.8%; P < .001) and nonexpert endoscopists (37.5% vs 32.1%; P = .023), and adenomas per colonoscopy (0.59 ± 0.97 vs 0.45 ± 0.81; P < .001) were all significantly higher in the AI-assisted colonoscopy. The median withdrawal time (8.3 minutes vs 7.8 minutes; P = .004) was slightly longer in the AI-assisted colonoscopy group. In this multicenter RCT in asymptomatic patients, AI-assisted colonoscopy improved overall ADR, advanced ADR, and ADR of both expert and nonexpert attending endoscopists. (ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT04422548).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
4秒前
6秒前
wpj发布了新的文献求助20
9秒前
一天一篇sci发布了新的文献求助100
20秒前
22秒前
卡琳完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
32秒前
漠北发布了新的文献求助10
39秒前
李健应助wpj采纳,获得10
42秒前
一天一篇sci发布了新的文献求助100
58秒前
lanvinnn阿银完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
大模型应助跳跃的小之采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
漠北发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
爆米花应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
完美世界应助zhj采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
畅快的篮球完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
杨同学完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
Hustle完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
兴尽晚回舟完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
hh完成签到,获得积分20
3分钟前
3分钟前
jyj1783716完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
一天一篇sci发布了新的文献求助100
3分钟前
hh发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
完美世界应助黄婷采纳,获得10
3分钟前
3分钟前
漠北发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
hsvxvk完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
cc完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
一天一篇sci发布了新的文献求助100
4分钟前
Georgechan完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
4分钟前
黄婷发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
黄婷完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
脑洞疼应助morena采纳,获得10
5分钟前
李金奥完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
6分钟前
高分求助中
Shape Determination of Large Sedimental Rock Fragments 2000
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2000
Rechtsphilosophie 1000
Bayesian Models of Cognition:Reverse Engineering the Mind 888
A Dissection Guide & Atlas to the Rabbit 600
Very-high-order BVD Schemes Using β-variable THINC Method 568
Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger Faszinierende Lauerjäger 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3130230
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2780957
关于积分的说明 7750570
捐赠科研通 2436201
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1294565
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 623731
版权声明 600590