创造力
认知
认知科学
对偶(语法数字)
背景(考古学)
动作(物理)
心理学
奖学金
即兴创作
过程(计算)
思维过程
双重过程理论(道德心理学)
认识论
认知心理学
社会心理学
计算机科学
数学教育
政治学
统计思维
量子力学
法学
生物
神经科学
视觉艺术
古生物学
艺术
哲学
文学类
物理
操作系统
标识
DOI:10.1177/07352751221088919
摘要
Sociologists increasingly draw on dual-process models of cognition to account for the ways context, cognition, and action interrelate. Drawing from 40 interviews with improvisers and observations from improvisational theater, I find that dual-process model scholarship is limited in three respects: It does not consider how cognition operates in situations where order and disruption are concurrent, it fails to realize there is interindividual variation in cognitive processing, and it underestimates the creativity emerging through automatic processes. Interactions in improv contain elements of both order and disruption, and they place demands on automatic and deliberate cognition simultaneously. Improvisers respond to these competing demands through either automatic or deliberate thinking dispositions, which are engendered through explicit instruction, practical experience, and artistic commitments. These dispositions, in turn, shape creative decision-making, predicting interindividual differences in how improvisers respond to contingencies on stage. I conclude by discussing the implications for culture, cognition, and action.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI