流式细胞术
单元格排序
白细胞介素2受体
细胞仪
生物
碘化丙啶
分类
细胞生物学
分子生物学
T细胞
免疫学
免疫系统
细胞凋亡
计算机科学
生物化学
程序性细胞死亡
程序设计语言
作者
Yan H,Chenguang Ding,Puxun Tian,Ge Gao,Zhankui Jin,Lining Jia,Xiaoming Ding,Xiaoming Pan,Wujun Xue
出处
期刊:Journal of Zhejiang University-science B
[Springer Nature]
日期:2009-12-01
卷期号:10 (12): 928-932
被引量:22
标识
DOI:10.1631/jzus.b0920205
摘要
In this paper we compared the two methods of cell sorting (magnetic cell sorting and flow cytometry sorting) for the isolation and function analysis of mouse CD4(+) CD25(+) regulatory T (Treg) cells, in order to inform further studies in Treg cell function.We separately used magnetic cell sorting and flow cytometry sorting to identify CD4(+) CD25(+) Treg cells. After magnetic cell separation, we further used flow cytometry to analyze the purity of CD4(+) CD25(+) Treg cells, trypan blue staining to detect cell viability, and propidium iodide (PI) staining to assess the cell viability. We detected the immune inhibition of CD4(+) CD25(+) Treg cells in the in vitro proliferation experiments.The results showed that compared to flow cytometry sorting, magnetic cell sorting took more time and effort, but fewer live cells were obtained than with flow cytometry sorting. The CD4(+) CD25(+) Treg cells, however, obtained with both methods have similar immunosuppressive capacities.The result suggests that both methods can be used in isolating CD4(+) CD25(+) Treg cells, and one can select the best method according to specific needs and availability of the methodologies.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI