医学
再现性
可视模拟标度
医学物理学
可靠性(半导体)
宣言
质量评定
血管性
病理
外科
统计
外部质量评估
计算机科学
数学
功率(物理)
物理
量子力学
程序设计语言
标识
DOI:10.12968/jowc.2012.21.1.30
摘要
Objective: To review the evidence regarding the use of tristimulus colourimeters (TC) in scar assessment. Method: A literature search was performed using ovid and the Cochrane database with the search terms ‘scar assessment’, ‘clinimetrics’, ‘tristimulus colourimeter’, ‘microcolour’, ‘chromameter’ and ‘colour spectrometer’. Results: Wound colour is usually assessed with a visual analogue scale, such as VSS or POSAS. Research on objectifying the assessment by using an assessment tool has so far been encouraging, but has failed to show a benefit over the visual analogue scales in terms of validity, accuracy and reproducibility. Studies vary in methodological quality. Conclusion: Research on TC clinimetrics has shown moderate to high concurrent validity, reliability and reproducibility of these products in terms of assessing vascularity, but less correlation in terms of pigmentation, when compared with the visual scoring systems. The evidence for using TC is based on a relatively small number of studies, and more research is needed before widespread implementation of TC for assessing scar maturation is recommended. Declaration of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. There were no external sources of funding for this report.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI