医学
入射(几何)
简明伤害量表
损伤严重程度评分
露天
死亡率
毒物控制
伤害预防
医疗急救
外科
爆炸伤
急诊医学
建筑工程
物理
光学
工程类
作者
Dan Leibovici,Ofer N. Gofrit,Michael L. Stein,Shmuel C. Shapira,Yossi Noga,Rafael J. Heruti,Joshua Shemer
出处
期刊:Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care
[Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
日期:1996-12-01
卷期号:41 (6): 1030-1035
被引量:372
标识
DOI:10.1097/00005373-199612000-00015
摘要
Objectives To compare injury patterns resulting from explosions in the open air versus within confined spaces. Methods Medical charts of 297 victims of four bombing events were analyzed. Two explosions occurred in the open air and two inside buses. Similar explosive devices were applied in all four incidents. The incidence of primary blast injuries, significant penetrating trauma (Abbreviated Injury Scale Score, > or = 2), burns, Injury Severity Score, Revised Trauma Score, and mortality were compared between the two populations. Results A total of 204 casualties were involved in open-air bombings, 15 of whom died (7.8%). Ninety-three victims were involved in bus bombings, 46 of whom died (49%). The difference in mortality rate was highly significant, p < 0.00001. Primary blast injuries were observed in 25 and 31 victims (34.2% and 77.5% of admitted victims), respectively (p = 0.00003). Median Injury Severity Score was 4 versus 18, respectively (p < 0.0001). Conclusion Explosions in confined spaces are associated with a higher incidence of primary blast injuries, with more severe injuries and with a higher mortality rate in comparison with explosions in the open air.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI