健康素养
读写能力
医学
利克特量表
家庭医学
人口
考试(生物学)
心理学
医学教育
医疗保健
环境卫生
教育学
发展心理学
政治学
古生物学
法学
生物
作者
Lisa D. Chew,Katharine A. Bradley,Edward J. Boyko
出处
期刊:PubMed
日期:2004-09-01
卷期号:36 (8): 588-94
被引量:1403
摘要
No practical method for identifying patients with low heath literacy exists. We sought to develop screening questions for identifying patients with inadequate or marginal health literacy.Patients (n=332) at a VA preoperative clinic completed in-person interviews that included 16 health literacy screening questions on a 5-point Likert scale, followed by a validated health literacy measure, the Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (STOHFLA). Based on the STOFHLA, patients were classified as having either inadequate, marginal, or adequate health literacy. Each of the 16 screening questions was evaluated and compared to two comparison standards: (1) inadequate health literacy and (2) inadequate or marginal health literacy on the STOHFLA.Fifteen participants (4.5%) had inadequate health literacy and 25 (7.5%) had marginal health literacy on the STOHFLA. Three of the screening questions, "How often do you have someone help you read hospital materials?" "How confident are you filling out medical forms by yourself?" and "How often do you have problems learning about your medical condition because of difficulty understanding written information?" were effective in detecting inadequate health literacy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.87, 0.80, and 0.76, respectively). These questions were weaker for identifying patients with marginal health literacy.Three questions were each effective screening tests for inadequate health literacy in this population.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI