Disruptive Behavior as a Predictor in Alzheimer Disease

危险系数 痴呆 精神病理学 心理学 队列 评定量表 置信区间 共病 医学 临床心理学 疾病 精神科 老年学 内科学 发展心理学
作者
Nikolaos Scarmeas,Jason Brandt,Deborah Blacker,Marilyn Albert,Georgios M. Hadjigeorgiou,Bruno Dubois,Devangere Devanand,Lawrence S. Honig,Yaakov Stern
出处
期刊:Archives of neurology [American Medical Association]
卷期号:64 (12): 1755-1755 被引量:153
标识
DOI:10.1001/archneur.64.12.1755
摘要

Disruptive behavior is common in Alzheimer disease (AD). There are conflicting reports regarding its ability to predict cognitive decline, functional decline, institutionalization, and mortality.To examine whether the presence of disruptive behavior has predictive value for important outcomes in AD.Using the Columbia University Scale for Psychopathology in Alzheimer Disease (administered every 6 months, for a total of 3438 visit-assessments and an average of 6.9 per patient), the presence of disruptive behavior (wandering, verbal outbursts, physical threats/violence, agitation/restlessness, and sundowning) was extracted and examined as a time-dependent predictor in Cox models. The models controlled for the recruitment cohort, recruitment center, informant status, sex, age, education, a comorbidity index, baseline cognitive and functional performance, and neuroleptic use.Five university-based AD centers in the United States and Europe (Predictors Study).Four hundred ninety-seven patients with early-stage AD (mean Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination score, 20 of 30 at entry) who were recruited and who underwent semiannual follow-up for as long as 14 (mean, 4.4) years.Cognitive (Columbia Mini-Mental State Examination score, < or = 20 of 57 [approximate Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination score, < or = 10 of 30]) and functional (Blessed Dementia Rating Scale score, parts I and II, > or = 10) ratings, institutionalization equivalent index, and death.At least 1 disruptive behavioral symptom was noted in 48% of patients at baseline and in 83% at any evaluation. Their presence was associated with increased risks of cognitive decline (hazard ratio 1.45 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03-2.03]), functional decline (1.66 [95% CI, 1.17-2.36]), and institutionalization (1.47 [95% CI, 1.10-1.97]). Sundowning was associated with faster cognitive decline, wandering with faster functional decline and institutionalization, and agitation/restlessness with faster cognitive and functional decline. There was no association between disruptive behavior and mortality (hazard ratio, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.71-1.25]).Disruptive behavior is very common in AD and predicts cognitive decline, functional decline, and institutionalization but not mortality.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
一个火蓉果啊完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
UP发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
到处找文献写综述完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
Clover完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
4秒前
gyh应助生气的泡面采纳,获得20
4秒前
GGBOND完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
瘦瘦世德完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
ZUOYAN完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
ma完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
自然白安完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
诸葛藏藏完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
xxt完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
121关闭了121文献求助
10秒前
10秒前
颜玖笙完成签到,获得积分20
10秒前
大土豆子发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
DOGDAD发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
disjustar应助零四零零柒贰采纳,获得60
11秒前
过时的热狗完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
傲娇的皮皮虾完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
12秒前
黄敏倪完成签到 ,获得积分20
12秒前
ioio完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
liu11发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
执着安莲完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
科研通AI6.2应助lubo采纳,获得10
13秒前
FiFi发布了新的文献求助30
13秒前
lo完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
XTT完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
Orange应助gsit采纳,获得10
16秒前
16秒前
17秒前
lxh完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
17秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Social Cognition: Understanding People and Events 1000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6029417
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7699913
关于积分的说明 16190209
捐赠科研通 5176651
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2770197
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1753495
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1639245