出版
出版
透明度(行为)
勤奋
公共关系
科学不端行为
工作(物理)
政治学
心理学
医学
工程类
法学
替代医学
社会心理学
机械工程
病理
作者
Sonya E. Van Nuland,Kem A. Rogers
摘要
Academic researchers who seek to publish their work are confronted daily with a barrage of e-mails from aggressive marketing campaigns that solicit them to publish their research with a specialized, often newly launched, journal. Known as predatory journals, they often promise high editorial and publishing standards, yet their exploitive business models, poor quality control, and minimal overall transparency victimize those researchers with limited academic experience and pave the way for low-quality articles that threaten the foundation of evidence-based research. Understanding how to identify these predatory journals requires thorough due diligence on the part of the submitting authors, and a commitment by reputable publishers, institutions, and researchers to publicly identify these predators and eliminate them as a threat to the careers of young scientists seeking to disseminate their work in scholarly journals. Anat Sci Educ 10: 392-394. © 2016 American Association of Anatomists.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI