肉汤微量稀释
琼脂稀释
最小抑制浓度
琼脂稀释法
微生物学
抗菌剂
琼脂
连续稀释
厌氧菌
生物
色谱法
化学
抗生素
万古霉素
琼脂平板
琼脂扩散试验
细菌
遗传学
作者
Christine J. Hastey,Suzanne E. Dale,Julia Nary,Diane M. Citron,Jennifer Law,Darcie E. Roe-Carpenter,Laurent Chesnel
出处
期刊:Anaerobe
[Elsevier]
日期:2017-04-01
卷期号:44: 73-77
被引量:21
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.anaerobe.2017.02.006
摘要
Due to increasing antibiotic resistance among anaerobic bacteria, routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing is recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). This study compared the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) from 920 Clostridium difficile isolates tested against seven antimicrobial agents using the two current CLSI reference methodologies, agar dilution method, vs broth microdilution method. A subset of isolate testing was performed independently by two laboratories to evaluate reproducibility. A negative bias was noted for MICs generated from broth microdilution compared to agar dilution and the reproducibility was variable and drug dependent. Therefore, broth microdilution is not recommended as an alternative to agar dilution for C. difficile antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI