Binding of eukaryotic initiation factor 3 (eIF3) to Barley Yellow Dwarf Virus (BYDV) untranslated regions (UTRs)

Viruses remain a major threat to human health and the global food sources. Viruses are obligate parasites that use their host's cellular machinery to translate their proteins, usually employing unique non-canonical translation mechanisms to outcompete the host cell mRNA for this machinery. BYDV is a positive-strand RNA virus that lacks the canonical 5ʹ 7-methylguanosine cap and a poly-A tail in its mRNA, instead utilizing a CITE (cap-independent translation element) in the 3ʹ UTR, termed as the 3ʹ BTE (BYDV like CITE). The BYDV 3ʹ BTE is 105-nt long and has a cruciform secondary structure with three stem loops SL-I, SL-II, SL-III and a base stem (SL-IV). BTE has been shown to use the host cell's eukaryotic translation initiation factor (eIF) 4G, eIF4A, eIF4B and ATP (an active helicase complex) to recruit the 40S ribosomal subunit. This 3ʹ BTE-recruited translation initiation complex must transfer to the 5ʹ end of the mRNA for scanning, AUG detection, and translation elongation to proceed. The 5ʹ UTR of BYDV is also structured, consisting of four stem loops, (SL-A, B, C and D), and the 3ʹ to 5ʹ transfer process is aided by a relatively weak, long-distance, ‘kissing-loop’, base pairing interaction between stem-loops in the 5ʹ and 3ʹ ends of BYDV. Recently, we showed that eIF3 plays a crucial role in this transfer by simultaneously binding to both the BYDV 5ʹ and 3ʹ UTRs. These binding interactions were found to be helicase dependent, and the UTRs did not compete for eIF3 binding, suggesting the presence of a transient complex. eIF3 has been shown to interact with both the 5ʹ IRES (Internal ribosome entry site) and 3ʹ UTR of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) simultaneously. In HCV-like IRESs, the eIF3 and the IRES binding site on the 40S subunit has been shown to overlap, requiring structural rearrangements and dislocation of eIF3 for IRES to bind. In BYDV, we expect similar rearrangements in the UTRs for eIF3 to successfully transfer the 40S complex from the 3ʹ to the 5ʹ end. To understand this macromolecular complex consisting of eIF3, the helicase complex, and the BYDV UTRs, we used a fusion RNA oligo comprising the BYDV 5ʹ UTR and 3ʹ BTE linked by a 12-base RNA linker and performed fluorescence anisotropy-based binding studies to eIF3. Interestingly, the helicase complex was not required for eIF3 binding to the Fusion oligo. SHAPE footprinting analyses performed on the fusion oligo showed that the presence of all helicase factors shifts the eIF3 binding site on the RNA closer to the kissing loop interaction between the UTRs. These data suggest that the helicase complex is not required for binding if the UTRs are in close proximity, but it does aid in rearranging the UTR RNAs to accommodate optimum eIF3 binding for eventual transfer of the 40S complex from the 3ʹ to the 5ʹ end of BYDV.