Kyoto classification risk scoring system and endoscopic grading of gastric intestinal metaplasia for gastric cancer: Multicenter observation study in Japan

医学 单变量分析 胃肠病学 内科学 优势比 接收机工作特性 肠化生 分级(工程) 癌症 多元分析 工程类 土木工程
作者
Masashi Kawamura,Noriya Uedo,Tomoyuki Koike,Takashi Kanesaka,Waku Hatta,Yohei Ogata,Tomoyuki Oikawa,Wataru Iwai,Satoshi Yokosawa,Junya Honda,Sho Asonuma,Hideki Okata,Motoki Ohyauchi,Hirotaka Ito,Yasuhiko Abe,Nobuyuki Ara,Shoichi Kayaba,Hirohiko Shinkai,Toshio Shimokawa
出处
期刊:Digestive Endoscopy [Wiley]
卷期号:34 (3): 508-516 被引量:57
标识
DOI:10.1111/den.14114
摘要

Objectives The usefulness of endoscopic and histological risk assessment for gastric cancer (GC) has not been fully investigated in Japanese clinical practice. Methods In this multicenter observation study, GC and non‐GC patients were prospectively enrolled in 10 Japanese facilities. The Kyoto classification risk scoring system, the Kimura–Takemoto endoscopic atrophy classification, the endoscopic grading of gastric intestinal metaplasia (EGGIM), the operative link on gastritis assessment (OLGA) and the operative link on gastric intestinal metaplasia assessment (OLGIM) were applied to all patients. The strength of an association with GC risk was compared. In addition, important endoscopic findings in the Kyoto classification were identified. Results Overall, 115 GC and 265 non‐GC patients were analyzed. Each risk stratification method had a significant association with GC risk in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, OLGIM stage III/IV (odds ratio [OR] 2.8 [95% CI 1.5–5.3]), high EGGIM score (OR 1.8 [1.0–3.1]) and opened‐type Kimura–Takemoto (OR 2.5 [1.4–4.5]) had significant associations with GC risk. In the Kyoto classification, opened‐type endoscopic atrophy, invisible regular arrangement of collecting venules (RAC), extensive (>30%) intestinal metaplasia in the corpus in image‐enhanced endoscopy, and map‐like redness in the corpus were independent high‐risk endoscopic findings. The modified Kyoto classification risk scoring system using these four findings demonstrated a better area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value (0.750, P = 0.052) than that of the original Kyoto classification (0.706). Conclusions The OLGIM stage III/IV, high EGGIM score and open‐typed Kimura–Takemoto had strong association with GC risk in Japanese patients. The modified Kyoto classification risk scoring system may be useful for GC risk assessment, which warrants further validation. (UMIN000027023).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
挚友发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
研值爆表完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
shi发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
qu发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
bababooey完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
科研通AI6.4的应助被消摇采纳,获得10
4秒前
研友-L.Y发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
CodeCraft的应助被KEI采纳,获得10
4秒前
5秒前
三旬老人发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
风中电源完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
888的应助被Dr.Dream采纳,获得40
7秒前
2jz发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
明亮的黑裤完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
开放芝麻完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
曾经的匪发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
luobo发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
shi发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
10秒前
香蕉觅云的应助被刻苦的元菱采纳,获得10
11秒前
赵莲花完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
碳水大王发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
14秒前
Jasper的应助被快乐的大傻采纳,获得10
15秒前
15秒前
15秒前
dafo完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
17秒前
17秒前
蔺不平发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
余生完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
17秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
IRTSD: Open-Source Data and Toolset for Electromagnetic Transient Analysis of Disturbances and IBR Control Malfunctions in Transmission Systems 1000
Spec 401: Standards for Jet Fuel Facility and Equipment Commissioning and Flushing at Airports, 2026.1 (Original Issue) 1000
Spec 103: Standard for Jet Fuel Quality Control at Airports, Revision 2026.1 1000
A Consideration on Use of Material Grades for Hull Structural Members Based on Fracture Toughness(Second Report) 500
AI Disclosure in Annual Reports: Evolution, Determinants, and Capital Market Participants’ Perceptions 500
5th World Conference on Detergents: Reinventing the Industry : Opportunities and Challenges 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8107646
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9516028
关于积分的说明 21500498
捐赠科研通 7684058
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3410532
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2537858
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2450385