布苏尔班
造血干细胞移植
内科学
氟达拉滨
危险系数
环磷酰胺
移植
全身照射
医学
养生
肿瘤科
化疗
置信区间
作者
Shifen Fan,Jiao Chen,Zhouyang Liu,Juan Xiao,Fan Jiang,Xiaomei Liu,Yuan Sun
出处
期刊:Stem Cells and Development
[Mary Ann Liebert]
日期:2021-11-13
卷期号:31 (1-2): 26-31
被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1089/scd.2021.0205
摘要
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) was considered as an only therapeutic strategy for chronic active Epstein–Barr virus (CAEBV) infection with few exceptions, while efficacy of various allo-HSCT conditioning regimens for CAEBV has not been fully investigated yet. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of cocktail conditioning regimen (CCR)-allo-HSCT with reduced-intensity conditioning regimen (RICR)-allo-HSCT for pediatric patients with CAEBV. Data of a total of 54 children with CAEBV from July 2015 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 32 patients received VP16, total body irradiation (TBI), busulfan, fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and antithymocyte globulin (ATG) (CCR1 group), 10 patients received VP16, ara-C, TBI, busulfan, fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and ATG (CCR2 group), and the remaining 12 patients received VP16, busulfan or melphalan, fludarabine, and ATG with or without ara-C (RICR group). The overall survival (OS), hematopoietic engraftment, the incidence of severe graft-versus-host disease, and other parameters were analyzed. After adjusting for potential confounders, CCR1 (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.023; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.001–0.448; P < 0.02) and CCR2 (HR: 0.028; 95% CI: 0.002–0.457; P < 0.02) were associated with a longer OS than RICR. The use of CCR could markedly improve the engraftment success rate and OS rate compared with RICR for pediatric patients with CAEBV.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI