Gamification in theory and action: A survey

概念化 实证研究 背景(考古学) 多学科方法 动作(物理) 透视图(图形) 领域(数学) 游戏娱乐 经验证据 工程伦理学 管理科学 心理学 知识管理 数据科学 计算机科学 社会学 认识论 社会科学 工程类 政治学 物理 量子力学 古生物学 哲学 数学 人工智能 纯数学 法学 生物
作者
Katie Seaborn,Deborah I. Fels
出处
期刊:International journal of human-computer studies [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:74: 14-31 被引量:1456
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.006
摘要

Gamification has drawn the attention of academics, practitioners and business professionals in domains as diverse as education, information studies, human–computer interaction, and health. As yet, the term remains mired in diverse meanings and contradictory uses, while the concept faces division on its academic worth, underdeveloped theoretical foundations, and a dearth of standardized guidelines for application. Despite widespread commentary on its merits and shortcomings, little empirical work has sought to validate gamification as a meaningful concept and provide evidence of its effectiveness as a tool for motivating and engaging users in non-entertainment contexts. Moreover, no work to date has surveyed gamification as a field of study from a human–computer studies perspective. In this paper, we present a systematic survey on the use of gamification in published theoretical reviews and research papers involving interactive systems and human participants. We outline current theoretical understandings of gamification and draw comparisons to related approaches, including alternate reality games (ARGs), games with a purpose (GWAPs), and gameful design. We present a multidisciplinary review of gamification in action, focusing on empirical findings related to purpose and context, design of systems, approaches and techniques, and user impact. Findings from the survey show that a standard conceptualization of gamification is emerging against a growing backdrop of empirical participants-based research. However, definitional subjectivity, diverse or unstated theoretical foundations, incongruities among empirical findings, and inadequate experimental design remain matters of concern. We discuss how gamification may to be more usefully presented as a subset of a larger effort to improve the user experience of interactive systems through gameful design. We end by suggesting points of departure for continued empirical investigations of gamified practice and its effects.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
赘婿应助大饼卷肉采纳,获得10
刚刚
刚刚
御风完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1351567822应助超爱香菜采纳,获得10
1秒前
灵剑山完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
阿欣完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
白紫寒完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
冷先森EPC发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
周末万岁发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
MoPunk发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
111完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
一一一完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
zhaiyi发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
充电宝应助kyt采纳,获得10
4秒前
汉堡包应助尘远知山静采纳,获得10
4秒前
RUSH完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
ice完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
zhaojing9532发布了新的文献求助30
7秒前
轻松不二完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
JamesPei应助MoPunk采纳,获得10
8秒前
小翎子完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
明理凝阳发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
zhaiyi完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
qqqaaz发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
Violet发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
cadnash发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
一丁点可爱完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind 1000
Technical Brochure TB 814: LPIT applications in HV gas insulated switchgear 1000
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 500
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 500
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 500
不知道标题是什么 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3970240
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3514997
关于积分的说明 11176725
捐赠科研通 3250268
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1795244
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 875725
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 805004