Effects of Lactobacillus buchneri as a silage inoculant and as a probiotic on feed intake, apparent digestibility and ruminal fermentation and microbiology in wethers fed low‐dry‐matter whole‐crop maize silage
Carlos Henrique Silveira Rabêlo,Fernanda Carvalho Basso,E. C. Lara,Letícia Galhardo Jorge,Carla Joice Härter,Lígia Garcia Mesquita,Luís Felipe Prada e Silva,Ricardo Andrade Reis
Abstract Lactobacillus buchneri was investigated as a silage inoculant and as a probiotic on feed intake, apparent digestibility, and ruminal fermentation and microbiology in wethers fed low‐dry‐matter ( DM ) whole‐crop maize silage. Maize forage (279 g/kg DM ) was ensiled without inoculant (untreated) and with L. buchneri CNCM I‐4323 at 1 × 10 5 cfu/g fresh forage (inoculated). Six cannulated wethers were arranged in a double 3 × 3 Latin square and assigned to one of three diets: (i) untreated maize silage (untreated), (ii) inoculated maize silage (inoculated), and (iii) untreated maize silage with a daily dose of L. buchneri (1 × 10 7 cfu/g supplied silage) injected directly into the rumen ( LB ‐probiotic). Wethers fed the inoculated diet had a higher ( p = .050) DM intake (1.30% body weight [ BW ]) than wethers fed untreated and LB ‐probiotic diets (1.17% and 1.18% BW respectively). The relative proportion of Ruminococcus flavefaciens (proportion of total estimated rumen bacterial 16S rDNA ) in the rumen of wethers fed inoculated and LB ‐probiotic diets (both 0.42%) tended ( p = .098) to be lower than in the untreated diet (0.83%). Lactobacillus buchneri as a silage inoculant or as a probiotic had little effect on the variables measured in wethers.