Health literacy and the perception of risk in a breast cancer family history clinic

乳腺癌 家族史 医学 健康素养 风险感知 家庭医学 人口 感知 读写能力 风险评估 妇科 癌症 心理学 环境卫生 医疗保健 内科学 经济 神经科学 经济增长 计算机科学 计算机安全 教育学
作者
E.J. Rutherford,Jacinta Kelly,Elaine Lehane,Vicki Livingstone,Bruno Cotter,Abeeda Butt,M. J. O’Sullivan,F. O Connell,H. P. Redmond,Mark Corrigan
出处
期刊:Surgeon-journal of The Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland [Elsevier]
卷期号:16 (2): 82-88 被引量:25
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.surge.2016.06.003
摘要

Informed consent is an essential component of medical practice, and especially so in procedural based specialties which entail varying degrees of risk. Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers in women, and as such is the focus of extensive research and significant media attention. Despite this, considerable misperception exists regarding the risk of developing breast cancer. This study aims to examine the accuracy of risk perception of women attending a breast cancer family history clinic, and to explore the relationship between risk perception accuracy and health literacy. A cross-sectional study of women attending a breast cancer family history clinic (n = 86) was carried out, consisting of a patient survey and a validated health literacy assessment. Patients’ perception of personal and population breast cancer risk was compared to actual risk as calculated by a validated risk assessment tool. Significant discordance between real and perceived risks was observed. The majority (83.7%) of women overestimated their personal lifetime risk of developing breast cancer, as well as that of other women of the same age (89.5%). Health literacy was considered potentially inadequate in 37.2% of patients; there was a correlation between low health literacy and increased risk perception inaccuracy across both personal ten-year (rs = 0.224, p = 0.039) and general ten-year population estimations. (rs = 0.267, p = 0.013). Inaccuracy in risk perception is highly prevalent in women attending a breast cancer family history clinic. Health literacy inadequacy is significantly associated with this inaccuracy.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
LizQAQ完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
tinatian270完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
3秒前
荼柒完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
cwj关注了科研通微信公众号
7秒前
7秒前
会飞的猪完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
科研通AI2S应助msl2023采纳,获得10
8秒前
zxy完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
张兴完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
Soleil发布了新的文献求助100
13秒前
TZZZZ发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
橙子完成签到,获得积分20
14秒前
科研通AI2S应助嗑瓜子传奇采纳,获得10
14秒前
科研通AI2S应助嗑瓜子传奇采纳,获得10
14秒前
PANYIAO完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
15秒前
Akim应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
16秒前
SciGPT应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
李雪晴发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
斯文败类应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
轻松冰旋应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
16秒前
CodeCraft应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
内向的跳跳糖完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
luna完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
18秒前
橙子发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
18秒前
19秒前
小马甲应助宫然采纳,获得10
19秒前
SwapExisting完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
yy完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
21秒前
Star完成签到,获得积分20
21秒前
科研通AI2S应助zqwm采纳,获得10
21秒前
醒略略完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
22秒前
22秒前
高分求助中
The Oxford Handbook of Social Cognition (Second Edition, 2024) 1050
The Young builders of New china : the visit of the delegation of the WFDY to the Chinese People's Republic 1000
юрские динозавры восточного забайкалья 800
English Wealden Fossils 700
Chen Hansheng: China’s Last Romantic Revolutionary 500
COSMETIC DERMATOLOGY & SKINCARE PRACTICE 388
Case Research: The Case Writing Process 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3141768
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2792736
关于积分的说明 7804148
捐赠科研通 2449027
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1303050
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 626718
版权声明 601260