医学
数字减影血管造影
狭窄
放射科
血管造影
磁共振成像
磁共振血管造影
超声波
图像减法
图像处理
计算机科学
图像(数学)
人工智能
二值图像
作者
Daniel R. Felbaum,Christina R. Maxwell,Stan Naydin,Andrew J. Ringer,Ricardó A. Hanel,Eric Sauvageau,Amin Aghaebrahim,Pedro Aguilar‐Salinas,Erol Veznedaroglu,Kenneth Liebman,Zakaria Hakma,Hirad Hedayat,Peter Kan,Visish M. Srinivasan,Mandy J. Binning
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.054
摘要
Carotid artery stenosis is frequently diagnosed through screening tests with noninvasive imaging. Because of differences noted between the various modalities, we sought to investigate our experience comparing noninvasive imaging (ultrasound, computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance angiography) with invasive imaging (digital subtraction angiography). In a multicenter retrospective analysis, 249 carotid vessels were reviewed based on angiography with the associated noninvasive imaging. Overall, medical or surgical decision management was changed in 43% (107/243) of cases investigated with digital subtraction angiography owing to a discrepancy between the measured percentage stenosis. In patients with potentially treatable carotid stenosis, angiography revealed nonsignificant stenosis 25.7% of the time. Angiography should be considered the confirmatory test for degree of stenosis in certain patients before definitive surgical treatment.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI