Highlighting discrepancies in walking prediction accuracy for patients with traumatic spinal cord injury: an evaluation of validated prediction models using a Canadian Multicenter Spinal Cord Injury Registry

医学 置信区间 接收机工作特性 逻辑回归 脊髓损伤 回廊的 队列 前瞻性队列研究 功能独立性测度 物理疗法 曲线下面积 内科学 脊髓 康复 精神科
作者
Philippe Phan,Jason Weatherald,Qiong Zhang,Carly S. Rivers,Vanessa K. Noonan,Tova Plashkes,Eugene K. Wai,Jérôme Paquet,Darren M. Roffey,Eve C. Tsai,Nader Fallah
出处
期刊:The Spine Journal [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:19 (4): 703-710 被引量:27
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2018.08.016
摘要

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Models for predicting recovery in traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) patients have been developed to optimize care. Several models predicting tSCI recovery have been previously validated, yet recent findings question their accuracy, particularly in patients whose prognoses are the least predictable.

PURPOSE

To compare independent ambulatory outcomes in AIS (ASIA [American Spinal Injury Association] Impairment Scale) A, B, C, and D patients, as well as in AIS B+C and AIS A+D patients by applying two existing logistic regression prediction models.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANT SAMPLE

Individuals with tSCI enrolled in the pan-Canadian Rick Hansen SCI Registry (RHSCIR) between 2004 and 2016 with complete neurologic examination and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) outcome data.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The FIM locomotor score was used to assess independent walking ability at 1-year follow-up.

METHODS

Two validated prediction models were evaluated for their ability to predict walking 1-year postinjury. Relative prognostic performance was compared with the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC).

RESULTS

In total, 675 tSCI patients were identified for analysis. In model 1, predictive accuracies for 675 AIS A, B, C, and D patients as measured by AUC were 0.730 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.622–0.838), 0.691 (0.533–0.849), 0.850 (0.771–0.928), and 0.516 (0.320–0.711), respectively. In 160 AIS B+C patients, model 1 generated an AUC of 0.833 (95% CI 0.771–0.895), whereas model 2 generated an AUC of 0.821 (95% CI 0.754–0.887). The AUC for 515 AIS A+D patients was 0.954 (95% CI 0.933–0.975) with model 1 and 0.950 (0.928–0.971) with model 2. The difference in prediction accuracy between the AIS B+C cohort and the AIS A+D cohort was statistically significant using both models (p=.00034; p=.00038). The models were not statistically different in individual or subgroup analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Previously tested prediction models demonstrated a lower predictive accuracy for AIS B+C than AIS A+D patients. These models were unable to effectively prognosticate AIS A+D patients separately; a failure that was masked when amalgamating the two patient populations. This suggests that former prediction models achieved strong prognostic accuracy by combining AIS classifications coupled with a disproportionately high proportion of AIS A+D patients.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
潮鸣完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
estrella完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
FYm完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
WJing发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
butterfly完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
丹青完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
老魏完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
大个应助Ther采纳,获得10
7秒前
天才小能喵完成签到 ,获得积分0
7秒前
HuanChen完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
苗广山完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
stop here完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
hhh发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
11秒前
semiaa完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
汉堡包应助小猪采纳,获得10
14秒前
甜蜜的荟发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
芜6完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
berkelerey12138完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
刘雪完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
完美梨愁完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
yyy完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
李健的粉丝团团长应助zzzz采纳,获得10
18秒前
Dudidu完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
一颗大树完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
潇洒的浩然完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
比比谁的速度快应助曾珍采纳,获得50
20秒前
22秒前
NiNi完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
Ther完成签到,获得积分20
24秒前
傲娇白安完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
25秒前
甜蜜的荟完成签到,获得积分20
26秒前
婷儿完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
高分求助中
【提示信息,请勿应助】关于scihub 10000
Les Mantodea de Guyane: Insecta, Polyneoptera [The Mantids of French Guiana] 3000
徐淮辽南地区新元古代叠层石及生物地层 3000
The Mother of All Tableaux: Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 3000
Handbook of Industrial Diamonds.Vol2 1100
Global Eyelash Assessment scale (GEA) 1000
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 550
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4038368
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3576068
关于积分的说明 11374313
捐赠科研通 3305780
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1819322
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 892672
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 815029