摘要
No AccessJournal of UrologyAdult Urology1 Feb 2021Comparative Analysis of Genomic Alterations across Castration Sensitive and Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer via Circulating Tumor DNA Sequencing Liancheng Fan, Xiaochen Fei, Yinjie Zhu, Jiahua Pan, Jianjun Sha, Chenfei Chi, Yiming Gong, Xinxing Du, Lixin Zhou, Baijun Dong, and Wei Xue Liancheng FanLiancheng Fan Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China , Xiaochen FeiXiaochen Fei Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China , Yinjie ZhuYinjie Zhu Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China , Jiahua PanJiahua Pan Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China , Jianjun ShaJianjun Sha Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China , Chenfei ChiChenfei Chi Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China , Yiming GongYiming Gong Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China , Xinxing DuXinxing Du Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China , Lixin ZhouLixin Zhou Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China , Baijun DongBaijun Dong ‡Correspondence: Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai200127, China telephone: +86 21 68383757; E-mail Address: [email protected] [BD]; Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China , and Wei XueWei Xue ‡ E-mail Address: [email protected] [WX]). Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000001363AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract Purpose: To explore the genomic profiles of Chinese patients with castration sensitive prostate cancer and those with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer via germline and circulating tumor DNA sequencing. Materials and Methods: A hybridization capture based next-generation sequencing assay was used to identify germline and somatic alterations in 50 genes including androgen receptor pathway genes, DNA damage repair pathway genes, TP53 and RB1. Results: We successfully sequenced DNA from 396 blood samples and 32 matched tumor tissue samples from 396 patients. We observed a similar frequency of deleterious germline alterations between patients with castration sensitive prostate cancer and metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (8.9% vs 9.8%, p >0.05). There was a high consistency (90.9%) between metastatic tumor tissue and matched circulating tumor DNA. Among patients who were circulating tumor DNA positive we observed significantly higher alteration frequencies of CDK12 (27.2% vs 6.4%, p <0.001) and FOXA1 (36.8% vs 15.3%, p <0.001) in our metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer cohort compared with the SU2C-PCF (Stand Up to Cancer-Prostate Cancer Foundation) cohort. Alteration frequencies of DNA damage repair pathway genes (66.7% vs 41.5%, p=0.015) and androgen receptor pathway genes (71.9% vs 48.8%, p=0.018) in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer were higher than in patients with de novo metastatic castration sensitive prostate cancer. Androgen receptor alteration was selectively enriched in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. Conclusions: Through genomic profiling of prostate cancer across clinical states we identified a similar frequency of deleterious germline alterations between patients with castration sensitive prostate cancer and metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. We explored the genomic diversity of androgen receptor and DNA damage repair pathway genes between patients with metastatic castration sensitive prostate cancer and metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. Higher alteration frequencies of CDK12 and FOXA1 were observed in our metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer cohort than in the SU2C-PCF cohort. Our findings support the view that circulating tumor DNA sequencing could guide clinical treatment for metastatic prostate cancer. References 1. : Integrative clinical genomics of advanced prostate cancer. Cell 2015; 161: 1215. Google Scholar 2. : Prospective genomic profiling of prostate cancer across disease states reveals germline and somatic alterations that may affect clinical decision making. JCO Precis Oncol 2017; 2017: 10. Google Scholar 3. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network:The molecular taxonomy of primary prostate cancer. Cell 2015; 163: 1011. Google Scholar 4. : Integrative genomic profiling of human prostate cancer. Cancer Cell 2010; 18: 11. Google Scholar 5. : The mutational landscape of lethal castration-resistant prostate cancer. Nature 2012; 487: 239. Google Scholar 6. : Genomics of lethal prostate cancer at diagnosis and castration resistance. J Clin Invest 2020; 130: 1743. Google Scholar 7. : The genomic landscape of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers reveals multiple distinct genotypes with potential clinical impact. Nat Commun 2019; 10: 5251. Google Scholar 8. : Clinical and genomic insights into circulating tumor DNA-based alterations across the spectrum of metastatic hormone-sensitive and castrate-resistant prostate cancer. EBioMedicine 2020; 54: 102728. Google Scholar 9. : DNA-repair defects and olaparib in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 1697. Google Scholar 10. : Genomic analysis of three metastatic prostate cancer patients with exceptional responses to carboplatin indicating different types of DNA repair deficiency. Eur Urol 2019; 75: 184. Google Scholar 11. : Differential response to olaparib treatment among men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer harboring BRCA1 or BRCA2 versus ATM mutations. Eur Urol 2019; 76: 452. Google Scholar 12. : DNA repair gene alterations and PARP inhibitor response in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2018; 16: 933. Google Scholar 13. : Oncogenic genomic alterations, clinical phenotypes, and outcomes in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 26: 3230. Google Scholar 14. : Circulating tumor DNA abundance and potential utility in de novo metastatic prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2019; 75: 667. Google Scholar 15. : Germline DNA repair gene mutation landscape in Chinese prostate cancer patients. Eur Urol 2019; 76: 280. Google Scholar 16. : A genomic and epigenomic atlas of prostate cancer in Asian populations. Nature 2020; 580: 93. Google Scholar 17. : Concordance of circulating tumor DNA and matched metastatic tissue biopsy in prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2017; 109: djx118. Google Scholar 18. : Genomic drivers of poor prognosis and enzalutamide resistance in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2019; 76: 562. Google Scholar 19. : Circulating tumor DNA genomics correlate with resistance to abiraterone and enzalutamide in prostate cancer. Cancer Discov 2018; 8: 444. Google Scholar 20. : Olaparib for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2020; 382: 2091. Google Scholar 21. : BRCA2 and other DDR genes in prostate cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11: 352. Google Scholar 22. : CDK12 regulates DNA repair genes by suppressing intronic polyadenylation. Nature 2018; 564: 141. Google Scholar 23. : The cyclin K/Cdk12 complex maintains genomic stability via regulation of expression of DNA damage response genes. Genes Dev 2011; 25: 2158. Google Scholar 24. : Clinical outcomes in cyclin-dependent kinase 12 mutant advanced prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2020; 77: 333. Google Scholar 25. : Pioneer factors in hormone-dependent cancers. Nat Rev Cancer 2012; 12: 381. Google Scholar 26. : Dual role of FoxA1 in androgen receptor binding to chromatin, androgen signalling and prostate cancer. EMBO J 2011; 30: 3962. Google Scholar 27. : The role of hepatocyte nuclear factor-3 alpha (Forkhead Box A1) and androgen receptor in transcriptional regulation of prostatic genes. Mol Endocrinol 2003; 17: 1484. Google Scholar 28. : FOXA1 mutations alter pioneering activity, differentiation and prostate cancer phenotypes. Nature 2019; 571: 408. Google Scholar 29. : Distinct structural classes of activating FOXA1 alterations in advanced prostate cancer. Nature 2019; 571: 413. Google Scholar Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (81572536, 81672850, 81772742, 81702840, 81702542, 81972578, 81902863 and 82002710), Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (19411967400, 19ZR1431000, 19XD1402300, 19YF1428400), Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (201640247, 2019LJ11), Shanghai Municipal Education Commission-Gaofeng Clinical Medicine Grant Support (20152215, 20191906), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (YG2016ZD08, YG2017MS47, YG2017MS52); Innovation Fund for Translational Research of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (TM201907), Shanghai Sailing Program (20YF1425300) and Incubating Program for clinical Research and Innovation of Renji Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (PYZY 16-008, PYXJS16-015, RJZZ19-17). © 2020 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByFan L, Fei X, Zhu Y, Chi C, Pan J, Sha J, Xin Z, Gong Y, Du X, Wang Y, Dong B and Xue W (2021) Distinct Response to Platinum-Based Chemotherapy among Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Harboring Alterations in Genes Involved in Homologous RecombinationJournal of Urology, VOL. 206, NO. 3, (630-637), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2021. Volume 205Issue 2February 2021Page: 461-469Supplementary Materials Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2020 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Keywordsprostatic neoplasmsreceptors, androgensDNA repaircyclin-dependent kinasescirculating tumor DNAAcknowledgmentsTingting Zhao, Xuan Zou and Yining Yang gave strong support to this study.MetricsAuthor Information Liancheng Fan Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China Equal study contribution. More articles by this author Xiaochen Fei Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China Equal study contribution. More articles by this author Yinjie Zhu Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China Equal study contribution. More articles by this author Jiahua Pan Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China More articles by this author Jianjun Sha Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China More articles by this author Chenfei Chi Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China More articles by this author Yiming Gong Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China More articles by this author Xinxing Du Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China More articles by this author Lixin Zhou Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China More articles by this author Baijun Dong Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China ‡Correspondence: Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai200127, China telephone: +86 21 68383757; E-mail Address: [email protected] [BD]; Equal study contribution. More articles by this author Wei Xue Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China ‡ E-mail Address: [email protected] [WX]). Equal study contribution. More articles by this author Expand All Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (81572536, 81672850, 81772742, 81702840, 81702542, 81972578, 81902863 and 82002710), Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (19411967400, 19ZR1431000, 19XD1402300, 19YF1428400), Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (201640247, 2019LJ11), Shanghai Municipal Education Commission-Gaofeng Clinical Medicine Grant Support (20152215, 20191906), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (YG2016ZD08, YG2017MS47, YG2017MS52); Innovation Fund for Translational Research of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (TM201907), Shanghai Sailing Program (20YF1425300) and Incubating Program for clinical Research and Innovation of Renji Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (PYZY 16-008, PYXJS16-015, RJZZ19-17). Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...