Validation of Screening Questions for Limited Health Literacy in a Large VA Outpatient Population

健康素养 医学 读写能力 领域 人口 考试(生物学) 家庭医学 接收机工作特性 老年学 医疗保健 环境卫生 内科学 心理学 古生物学 法学 经济 生物 经济增长 教育学 政治学
作者
Lisa D. Chew,Joan M. Griffin,Melissa R. Partin,Siamak Noorbaloochi,Joseph P. Grill,Annamay Snyder,Katharine A. Bradley,Sean Nugent,Alisha D. Baines,Michelle VanRyn
出处
期刊:Journal of General Internal Medicine [Springer Nature]
卷期号:23 (5): 561-566 被引量:1216
标识
DOI:10.1007/s11606-008-0520-5
摘要

Previous studies have shown that a single question may identify individuals with inadequate health literacy. We evaluated and compared the performance of 3 health literacy screening questions for detecting patients with inadequate or marginal health literacy in a large VA population. We conducted in-person interviews among a random sample of patients from 4 VA medical centers that included 3 health literacy screening questions and 2 validated health literacy measures. Patients were classified as having inadequate, marginal, or adequate health literacy based on the Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (S-TOFHLA) and the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM). We evaluated the ability of each of 3 questions to detect: 1) inadequate and the combination of “inadequate or marginal” health literacy based on the S-TOFHLA and 2) inadequate and the combination of “inadequate or marginal” health literacy based on the REALM. Of 4,384 patients, 1,796 (41%) completed interviews. The prevalences of inadequate health literacy were 6.8% and 4.2%, based on the S-TOHFLA and REALM, respectively. Comparable prevalences for marginal health literacy were 7.4% and 17%, respectively. For detecting inadequate health literacy, “How confident are you filling out medical forms by yourself?” had the largest area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC) of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.69–0.79) and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.79–0.89) based on the S-TOFHLA and REALM, respectively. AUROCs were lower for detecting “inadequate or marginal” health literacy than for detecting inadequate health literacy for each of the 3 questions. A single question may be useful for detecting patients with inadequate health literacy in a VA population.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
罗氏集团发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
1秒前
搜集达人应助joker采纳,获得10
2秒前
Zshen发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
害羞含卉发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
xmyang完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
虚心岂愈发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
Lucas应助shinn采纳,获得10
7秒前
8秒前
王荣利完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
9秒前
xin完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
科目三应助儒雅颜采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
11秒前
12秒前
完美世界应助Pureasy采纳,获得10
13秒前
joker发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
王荣利发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
15秒前
互助应助Jy采纳,获得10
15秒前
所所应助fan采纳,获得10
15秒前
16秒前
搜集达人应助佐小叶采纳,获得10
16秒前
17秒前
木易杨发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
17秒前
yike发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
18秒前
18秒前
18秒前
19秒前
栖遇完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
一蓑烟雨完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
Jasper应助张欣怡采纳,获得10
20秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Encyclopedia of Forensic and Legal Medicine Third Edition 5000
Agyptische Geschichte der 21.30. Dynastie 2000
中国脑卒中防治报告 1000
Variants in Economic Theory 1000
Global Ingredients & Formulations Guide 2014, Hardcover 1000
Research for Social Workers 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5826378
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 6014938
关于积分的说明 15569392
捐赠科研通 4946629
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2664904
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1610755
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1565665