Dopamine versus norepinephrine in the treatment of septic shock

医学 相对风险 随机对照试验 观察研究 研究异质性 荟萃分析 感染性休克 置信区间 内科学 漏斗图 出版偏见 麻醉 败血症
作者
Daniel De Backer,César Aldecoa,Hassane Njimi,Jean‐Louis Vincent
出处
期刊:Critical Care Medicine [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:40 (3): 725-730 被引量:353
标识
DOI:10.1097/ccm.0b013e31823778ee
摘要

There has long-been controversy about the possible superiority of norepinephrine compared to dopamine in the treatment of shock. The objective was to evaluate the effects of norepinephrine and dopamine on outcome and adverse events in patients with septic shock.A systematic search of the MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and CENTRAL databases, and of Google Scholar, up to June 30, 2011.All studies providing information on the outcome of patients with septic shock treated with dopamine compared to norepinephrine were included. Observational and randomized trials were analyzed separately. Because time of outcome assessment varied among trials, we evaluated 28-day mortality or closest estimate. Heterogeneity among trials was assessed using the Cochrane Q homogeneity test. A Forest plot was constructed and the aggregate relative risk of death was computed. Potential publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots.We retrieved five observational (1,360 patients) and six randomized (1,408 patients) trials, totaling 2,768 patients (1,474 who received norepinephrine and 1,294 who received dopamine). In observational studies, among which there was significant heterogeneity (p < .001), there was no difference in mortality (relative risk, 1.09; confidence interval, 0.84-1.41; p = .72). A sensitivity analysis identified one trial as being responsible for the heterogeneity; after exclusion of that trial, no heterogeneity was observed and dopamine administration was associated with an increased risk of death (relative risk, 1.23; confidence interval, 1.05-1.43; p < .01). In randomized trials, for which no heterogeneity or publication bias was detected (p = .77), dopamine was associated with an increased risk of death (relative risk, 1.12; confidence interval, 1.01-1.20; p = .035). In the two trials that reported arrhythmias, these were more frequent with dopamine than with norepinephrine (relative risk, 2.34; confidence interval, 1.46-3.77; p = .001).In patients with septic shock, dopamine administration is associated with greater mortality and a higher incidence of arrhythmic events compared to norepinephrine administration.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
材料小白发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
Pepsi发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
乐观忆灵完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
卷王完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
脑残骑士老张完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
bringlingling发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
思源应助酸奶燕麦球采纳,获得10
4秒前
莫失莫忘完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
Kenzonvay完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
mhxu完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
ferritin完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
guanzhuang完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
秋山伊夫完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
LLHH发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
粗犷的惋清完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
清秀的煜城完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
cs完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
dm11完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
hfy完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
科研通AI5应助可靠的灵珊采纳,获得10
8秒前
TS发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
QQ完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
等待的忻完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
行者完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
火星上如松完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
asdzsx完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
大乐发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
wuqian完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
季夏完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
迷你的隶完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
Cactus应助麦秋采纳,获得10
11秒前
eagle发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
高分求助中
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine Board Review 1000
こんなに痛いのにどうして「なんでもない」と医者にいわれてしまうのでしょうか 510
Walter Gilbert: Selected Works 500
An Annotated Checklist of Dinosaur Species by Continent 500
岡本唐貴自伝的回想画集 500
Distinct Aggregation Behaviors and Rheological Responses of Two Terminally Functionalized Polyisoprenes with Different Quadruple Hydrogen Bonding Motifs 450
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3661418
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3222442
关于积分的说明 9745787
捐赠科研通 2932029
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1605426
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 757898
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 734576