Taking Situatedness Seriously in Theorizing About Competitive Advantage Through Artificial Intelligence: A Response to Kemp’s “Competitive Advantages Through Artificial Intelligence”

竞争优势 人工智能 竞争情报 管理 西门子 社会学 计算机科学 经济 工程类 电气工程
作者
Christine Möser,Vern Glaser,Dirk Lindebaum
出处
期刊:Academy of Management Review [Academy of Management]
卷期号:49 (3): 683-685 被引量:8
标识
DOI:10.5465/amr.2023.0265
摘要

Academy of Management ReviewIn-Press DialogueTaking Situatedness Seriously in Theorizing about Competitive Advantage through Artificial Intelligence: A Response to Kemp's "Competitive Advantages through Artificial Intelligence"Christine Moser, Vern L. Glaser and Dirk LindebaumChristine MoserVrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Vern L. GlaserUniversity of Alberta, Canada and Dirk LindebaumGrenoble Ecole de Management, FranceAccepted by Sergio LazzariniPublished Online:4 Jan 2024https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2023.0265AboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB ToolsDownload CitationsAdd to favoritesTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail View articleREFERENCESAxa. 2023. AXA offers secure Generative AI to employees. Retrieved from https://www.axa.com/en/press/press-releases/axa-offers-securegenerative-ai-to-employees. Google ScholarBalasubramanian, N., Ye, Y., & Xu, M. 2022. Substituting human decision-making with machine learning: Implications for organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 47: 448–465.Link , Google ScholarBarney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17: 99–120. Google ScholarBergen, M., Dutta, S., Guszcza, J., & Zbaracki, M. 2021, March 26. How AI can help companies set prices more ethically. Harvard Business Review. Google ScholarBornoff, R., Berger, D., & Liu, K. 2023. The potential impact of large language models (LLMs) on computer aided engineering. Siemens. Retrieved from https://blogs.sw.siemens.com/art-of-the-possible/2023/07/19/the-potential-impact-of-llms-on-cae/. Google ScholarBucher, T. 2017. The algorithmic imaginary: Exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms. Information Communication and Society, 20: 30–44. Google ScholarChong, D. 2020, April 30. Deep dive into Netflix's recommender system. Medium. Google Scholarden Hond, F., & Moser, C. 2022. Useful servant or dangerous master? Technology in Business and Society debates. Business & Society, 62: 87–116. Google ScholarEmirbayer, M., & Mische, A. 1998. What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103: 962–1023. Google ScholarFrenkel, S., & Kang, C. 2021. An ugly truth: Inside Facebook's battle for domination. London, U.K.: The Bridge Street Press. Google ScholarGlaser, V. L., Omidvar, O., & Safavi, M. 2023. Predictive models can lose the plot. Here's how to keep them on track. MIT Sloan Management Review, 64: 20–25. Google ScholarGlaser, V., Pollock, N., & D'Adderio, L. 2021. The biography of an algorithm: Performing algorithmic technologies in organizations. Organization Theory, 2: 1–27. Google ScholarGregory, R. W., Henfridsson, O., Kaganer, E., & Kyriakou, H. 2021. The role of artificial intelligence and data network effects for creating user value. Academy of Management Review, 46: 534–551.Link , Google ScholarKemp, A. 2023. Competitive advantages through artificial intelligence: Toward a theory of situated AI. Academy of Management Review. Forthcoming. Google ScholarKraatz, M. S., & Flores, R. 2015. Introduction. In M. S. Kraatz (Ed.), Research in the sociology of organizations, vol. 44: Institutions and ideals—Philip Selznick's legacy for organizational studies: 1–7. Bingley, U.K.: Emerald Group Publishing. Google ScholarLindebaum, D., Glaser, V., Moser, C., & Ashraf, M. 2023. When algorithms rule, values can wither. MIT Sloan Management Review, 64: 66–69. Google ScholarLindebaum, D., Moser, C., Ashraf, M., & Glaser, V. L. 2023. Reading the technological society to understand the mechanization of values and its ontological consequences. Academy of Management Review, 48: 575–592.Link , Google ScholarLindebaum, D., Vesa, M., & Den Hond, F. 2020. Insights from "The Machine Stops" to better understand rational assumptions in algorithmic decision-making and its implications for organizations. Academy of Management Review, 45: 247–263.Link , Google ScholarMoser, C., den Hond, F., & Lindebaum, D. 2022a. Morality in the age of artificially intelligent algorithms. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 21: 139–155.Link , Google ScholarMoser, C., den Hond, F., & Lindebaum, D. 2022b. What humans lose when we let AI decide. MIT Sloan Management Review, 63: 12–14. Google ScholarMurray, A., Rhymer, J., & Sirmon, D. 2021. Humans and technology: Forms of conjoined agency in organizational routines. Academy of Management Review, 46: 552–571.Link , Google ScholarNewlands, G. 2020. Algorithmic surveillance in the gig economy: The organization of work through Lefebvrian conceived space. Organization Studies, 42: 719–737. Google ScholarOmidvar, O., Safavi, M., & Glaser, V. L. 2022. Algorithmic routines and dynamic inertia: How organizations avoid adapting to changes in the environment. Journal of Management Studies, 60: 313–345. Google ScholarOrlikowski, W. J. 2007. Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28: 1435–1448. Google ScholarOrlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. 2008. Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Academy of Management Annals, 2: 433–474.Link , Google ScholarOrlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. 2023. The digital undertow and institutional displacement: A sociomaterial approach. Organization Theory, 4(2). Google ScholarPinhammer, J. 2023. Dm drugstore launches own AI chatbot dmGPT. Retail Optimiser. Retrieved from https://retail-optimiser.de/en/dm-drugstore-launches-own-ai-chatbot-dmgpt/. Google ScholarRaisch, S., & Krakowski, S. 2021. Artificial intelligence and management: The automation–augmentation paradox. Academy of Management Review, 46: 192–210.Link , Google ScholarRindova, V. P., & Martins, L. L. 2023. Moral imagination, the collective desirable, and strategic purpose. Strategy Science, 8: 170–181. Google Scholarvan Houwelingen, G., & Stoelhorst, J. 2023. Digital is different: Digitalization undermines stakeholder relations because it impedes firm anthropomorphization. Academy of Management Discoveries, 9: 297–319.Link , Google ScholarFiguresReferencesRelatedDetails In-Press Permissions Metrics in the past 12 months History Published online 4 January 2024 Information© Academy of Management ReviewDownload PDF
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
贵贵完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
CipherSage应助蔡6705采纳,获得10
刚刚
lhcshuang发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
陈富贵完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
TanXu完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
南冥完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
无私的芹应助狂野忆文采纳,获得10
3秒前
所所应助狂野忆文采纳,获得10
3秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助狂野忆文采纳,获得10
3秒前
斯文败类应助狂野忆文采纳,获得10
3秒前
无花果应助狂野忆文采纳,获得10
3秒前
上官若男应助狂野忆文采纳,获得10
3秒前
赘婿应助狂野忆文采纳,获得10
3秒前
顾矜应助狂野忆文采纳,获得10
3秒前
情怀应助狂野忆文采纳,获得10
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
光亮若翠完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
Atopos完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
CAOHOU应助小鱼女侠采纳,获得10
6秒前
平常星星完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
无花果应助流川枫采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
巧克力手印完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
单薄裘完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
坚果发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
内向怀曼发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
风中的丝袜完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
wang完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
能干冰露完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
王歪歪完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
jidou1011发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
乐乐乐乐乐乐应助宋鹏浩采纳,获得10
10秒前
CX完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
鳄鱼不做饿梦完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
高分求助中
【提示信息,请勿应助】关于scihub 10000
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
Coking simulation aids on-stream time 450
北师大毕业论文 基于可调谐半导体激光吸收光谱技术泄漏气体检测系统的研究 390
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
Robot-supported joining of reinforcement textiles with one-sided sewing heads 360
Novel Preparation of Chitin Nanocrystals by H2SO4 and H3PO4 Hydrolysis Followed by High-Pressure Water Jet Treatments 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4015762
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3555701
关于积分的说明 11318515
捐赠科研通 3288899
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1812318
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 887882
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 812027