Consensus statements on endoscopic ultrasound‐guided tissue acquisition. Guidelines from the Asian Endoscopic Ultrasound Group

Objectives This consensus was developed by the Asian EUS Group (AEG), who aimed to formulate a set of practice guidelines addressing various aspects of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided tissue acquisition (EUS‐TA). Methods The AEG initiated the development of consensus statements and formed an expert panel comprising surgeons, gastroenterologists, and pathologists. Three online consensus meetings were conducted to consolidate the statements and votes. The statements were presented and discussed in the first two consensus meetings and revised according to comments. Final voting was conducted at a third consensus meeting. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system was adopted to define the strength of the recommendations and quality of evidence. Results A total of 20 clinical questions and statements regarding EUS‐TA were formulated. The committee recommended that fine‐needle biopsy (FNB) needles be preferred over conventional fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) needles for EUS‐TA of subepithelial lesions. For solid pancreatic masses, rapid on‐site evaluation is not routinely recommended when FNB needles are used. For dedicated FNB needles, fork‐tip and Franseen‐tip needles have essentially equivalent performance. Conclusion This consensus provides guidance for EUS‐TA, thereby enhancing the quality of EUS‐TA.