Efficacy and safety of probiotics in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials using ROME IV criteria

医学 肠易激综合征 荟萃分析 内科学 安慰剂 随机对照试验 膨胀 不利影响 临床试验 生活质量(医疗保健) 物理疗法 腹痛 替代医学 病理 护理部
作者
Georgios Konstantis,Stylianos Efstathiou,Chryssa Pourzitaki,Elisavet Kitsikidou,Georgios Germanidis,Michail Chourdakis
出处
期刊:Clinical Nutrition [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:42 (5): 800-809 被引量:8
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.clnu.2023.03.019
摘要

Background Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is a functional gastrointestinal disorder which affects a great number of patients globally. Clinical trials and meta-analyses have evaluated different therapies for IBS. Some of them have shown that probiotics play a significant role in the management of IBS-patients. Nevertheless, results are controversial, and the efficacy of the administration of probiotics remains to be confirmed, especially in regard to which type of probiotic-strains are beneficial. Aim The aim of the present meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy and safety of the administration of probiotics to IBS-patients with a diagnosis based on Rome IV criteria, which is performed for the first time. Methods Electronic databases (Pubmed, Scopus and Cochrane) were searched until 26.01.2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studying the administration of probiotics in adult IBS-patients, who were categorized according to the Rome IV criteria. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (ROB) 2.0. Weighted and standardized mean difference with the 95% confidence intervals were used for the synthesis of the results. Primary outcomes were the decrease of IBS-Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS) and decrease of abdominal pain. The secondary outcomes were the improvement in quality of life (QoL) and the decrease of bloating. Lastly, the adverse effects of probiotics were evaluated. The protocol of the study has been registered at protocols.io (DOI dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.14egn218yg5d/v1). Results Six double-blind (N = 970) placebo-control RCTs fulfilled the inclusion criteria and overall, nine different strains of probiotics were examined. No significant reduction in IBS-SSS (WMD −43.2, 95% CI −87.5 to 1.0, I2 = 82.9%) was demonstrated, whereas a significant decrease regarding abdominal pain (SMD −0.94, 95% CI −1.53 to −0.35, I2 = 92,2) was shown. Furthermore, no correlation between improvement of QoL and the use of probiotics (SMD −0.64, 95% CI −1.27 to 0.00, I2 = 93,9%) was shown. However, probiotics were associated with a significant reduction in bloating (SMD −0.28, 95% CI −0.47 to −0.09, I2 = 36,0%). A qualitative synthesis was conducted about adverse events and showed that the use of probiotics’ is safe without severe adverse events. Conclusions The administration of probiotics to IBS-patients demonstrated a positive effect on pain and bloating, but due to significant heterogeneity and confounding factors, that were not examined in the included studies, a definitive statement cannot be made. Moreover, probiotics did not lead to an improvement in other parameters. There is a need for larger RCTs in IBS-patients diagnosed according to Rome IV (not III) criteria and especially it is essential to be conducted RCTs which examine the administration of specific strains and have similar methodological characteristics.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
饱满思远关注了科研通微信公众号
3秒前
luckweb完成签到,获得积分0
4秒前
JamesPei应助泡芙采纳,获得10
6秒前
桐桐应助不安君浩采纳,获得10
6秒前
eleusis完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
9秒前
10秒前
忧虑的真发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
苏辞发布了新的文献求助30
14秒前
16秒前
16秒前
zho发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
18秒前
FashionBoy应助John采纳,获得10
21秒前
23秒前
24秒前
打打应助陈老派采纳,获得10
24秒前
十三完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
train完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
淡然冬灵发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
31秒前
万能图书馆应助嘻嘻采纳,获得10
32秒前
萨柏斯塔发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
万能图书馆应助莫岸采纳,获得10
33秒前
小龟完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
CodeCraft应助可靠的寒风采纳,获得10
34秒前
34秒前
陈老派发布了新的文献求助10
35秒前
36秒前
英俊的铭应助ljj301采纳,获得10
36秒前
benyu完成签到,获得积分10
37秒前
我服有点黑完成签到,获得积分10
37秒前
FashionBoy应助捣蛋采纳,获得10
37秒前
dddyrrrrr完成签到 ,获得积分10
38秒前
小枣发布了新的文献求助10
39秒前
完美世界应助小白采纳,获得10
40秒前
41秒前
John发布了新的文献求助10
41秒前
高分求助中
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Ophthalmic Equipment Market 1500
Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine Board Review 1000
こんなに痛いのにどうして「なんでもない」と医者にいわれてしまうのでしょうか 510
いちばんやさしい生化学 500
The First Nuclear Era: The Life and Times of a Technological Fixer 500
Unusual formation of 4-diazo-3-nitriminopyrazoles upon acid nitration of pyrazolo[3,4-d][1,2,3]triazoles 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3672805
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3228883
关于积分的说明 9782581
捐赠科研通 2939308
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1610843
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 760758
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 736203