Definition, Measurement, Precursors, and Outcomes of Trust Within Health Care Teams: A Scoping Review

心理信息 奇纳 医疗保健 梅德林 主题分析 心理学 知识管理 护理部 医学教育 定性研究 医学 计算机科学 心理干预 社会学 政治学 法学 社会科学
作者
Ailsa Lauren Hamilton,Elizabeth Layden,Neill Storrar,Janet Skinner,Jeni Harden,Morwenna Wood
出处
期刊:Academic Medicine [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:99 (1): 106-117 被引量:7
标识
DOI:10.1097/acm.0000000000005320
摘要

Abstract Purpose This scoping review aims to map the breadth of the literature examining how trust is defined in health care teams, describe what measurements of trust are used, and investigate the precursors and outcomes of trust. Method Five electronic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Embase, and ASSIA [Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts]) were searched alongside sources of gray literature in February 2021. To be included, studies needed to discuss a health care team directly involved in managing patient care and one aspect of trust as a relational concept. A content count of the definitions of trust and tools used to measure trust and a deductive thematic analysis of the precursors and outcomes of trust in health care teams were conducted. Results Ultimately, 157 studies were included after full-text review. Trust was the main focus of 18 (11%) studies and was not routinely defined (38, 24%). Ability appeared to be key to the definition. Trust was measured in 34 (22%) studies, often using a bespoke measure (8/34, 24%). The precursors of trust within health care teams occur at the individual, team, and organizational levels. The outcomes of trust occur at the individual, team, and patient levels. Communication was a broad overarching theme that was present at all levels, both as a precursor and outcome of trust. Respect, as a precursor, influenced trust at the individual, team, and organizational levels, while trust influenced learning, an outcome, across the patient, individual, and team levels. Conclusions Trust is a complex, multilevel construct. This scoping review has highlighted gaps in the literature, including exploration of the swift trust model, which may be applicable to health care teams. Furthermore, knowledge from this review may be integrated into future training and health care practices to optimize team processes and teamworking.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
淡定的忆南关注了科研通微信公众号
刚刚
一路生花发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
刚刚
帅气的高跟鞋完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
浅梦星河完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
务实的雍完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
科目三应助香辣鸡腿堡采纳,获得10
1秒前
温温完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
Rose完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
Bowen发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
云不暇完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
皮皮完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
忧郁的友琴完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
5秒前
5秒前
砂锅粥发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
JIAYIWANG完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
kingnb发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
小彬发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
晓夜发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
Huangxy发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
洁净的连虎完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
Anonymous完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
小强x完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
科目三应助inspins采纳,获得10
8秒前
jasmine发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
牛子妹发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
Prescott's Microbiology: 2026 Release ISE 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Environmental Leverage in Times of Climate Crisis: Product Standards, Carbon Border Measures and Preferential Trade Agreements 1000
Erwählung und Berufung bei Paulus: Bedeutung, Entwicklung und Funktion einer Vorstellung in ihrem frühjüdischen und griechisch-römischen Kontext 850
The Cambridge Handbook of Intellectual Property and Upcycling 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7207722
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8840998
关于积分的说明 18657849
捐赠科研通 6857191
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3181452
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2340745
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2155813