Definition, Measurement, Precursors, and Outcomes of Trust Within Health Care Teams: A Scoping Review

心理信息 奇纳 医疗保健 梅德林 主题分析 心理学 知识管理 护理部 医学教育 定性研究 医学 计算机科学 心理干预 社会学 政治学 法学 社会科学
作者
Ailsa Lauren Hamilton,Elizabeth Layden,Neill Storrar,Janet Skinner,Jeni Harden,Morwenna Wood
出处
期刊:Academic Medicine [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:99 (1): 106-117 被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1097/acm.0000000000005320
摘要

Abstract Purpose This scoping review aims to map the breadth of the literature examining how trust is defined in health care teams, describe what measurements of trust are used, and investigate the precursors and outcomes of trust. Method Five electronic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Embase, and ASSIA [Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts]) were searched alongside sources of gray literature in February 2021. To be included, studies needed to discuss a health care team directly involved in managing patient care and one aspect of trust as a relational concept. A content count of the definitions of trust and tools used to measure trust and a deductive thematic analysis of the precursors and outcomes of trust in health care teams were conducted. Results Ultimately, 157 studies were included after full-text review. Trust was the main focus of 18 (11%) studies and was not routinely defined (38, 24%). Ability appeared to be key to the definition. Trust was measured in 34 (22%) studies, often using a bespoke measure (8/34, 24%). The precursors of trust within health care teams occur at the individual, team, and organizational levels. The outcomes of trust occur at the individual, team, and patient levels. Communication was a broad overarching theme that was present at all levels, both as a precursor and outcome of trust. Respect, as a precursor, influenced trust at the individual, team, and organizational levels, while trust influenced learning, an outcome, across the patient, individual, and team levels. Conclusions Trust is a complex, multilevel construct. This scoping review has highlighted gaps in the literature, including exploration of the swift trust model, which may be applicable to health care teams. Furthermore, knowledge from this review may be integrated into future training and health care practices to optimize team processes and teamworking.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
汪汪汪发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
Elin完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
rui完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
杀出个黎明应助fengyinhe采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
小小完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
Unifate发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
苏继谙完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
rui发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
暮光微凉发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
CipherSage应助xy采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
CY完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
zhu发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
邓飞飞发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
Jinnnnn完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
19秒前
种地小能手~完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
S飞发布了新的文献求助30
19秒前
20秒前
20秒前
21秒前
冬虫夏草完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
乐乐应助hihi采纳,获得10
21秒前
accept完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
人言不足畏完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
脆脆鲨发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 2000
Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine Board Review 1000
こんなに痛いのにどうして「なんでもない」と医者にいわれてしまうのでしょうか 510
いちばんやさしい生化学 500
The First Nuclear Era: The Life and Times of a Technological Fixer 500
岡本唐貴自伝的回想画集 500
A mandible of Pliosaurus brachyspondylus (Reptilia, Sauropterygia) from the Kimmeridgian of the Boulonnais (France) 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3680916
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3233098
关于积分的说明 9806237
捐赠科研通 2944452
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1614657
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 762274
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 737328