Evaluation of Computer-Aided Detection During Colonoscopy in the Community (AI-SEE): A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial

结肠镜检查 医学 腺瘤 随机对照试验 内科学 胃肠病学 人口统计学的 内窥镜检查 结直肠癌 癌症 社会学 人口学
作者
Mike Wei,Uday Shankar,Russell Parvin,Syed Hasan Abbas,Sushant Chaudhary,Yishai Friedlander,Shai Friedland
出处
期刊:The American Journal of Gastroenterology [American College of Gastroenterology]
卷期号:118 (10): 1841-1847 被引量:34
标识
DOI:10.14309/ajg.0000000000002239
摘要

There has been increasing interest in artificial intelligence in gastroenterology. To reduce miss rates during colonoscopy, there has been significant exploration in computer-aided detection (CADe) devices. In this study, we evaluate the use of CADe in colonoscopy in community-based, nonacademic practices.Between September 28, 2020, and September 24, 2021, a randomized controlled trial (AI-SEE) was performed evaluating the impact of CADe on polyp detection in 4 community-based endoscopy centers in the United States Patients were block-randomized to undergoing colonoscopy with or without CADe (EndoVigilant). Primary outcomes measured were adenomas per colonoscopy and adenomas per extraction (the percentage of polyps removed that are adenomas). Secondary end points included serrated polyps per colonoscopy; nonadenomatous, nonserrated polyps per colonoscopy; adenoma and serrated polyp detection rates; and procedural time.A total of 769 patients were enrolled (387 with CADe), with similar patient demographics between the 2 groups. There was no significant difference in adenomas per colonoscopy in the CADe and non-CADe groups (0.73 vs 0.67, P = 0.496). Although the use of CADe did not improve identification of serrated polyps per colonoscopy (0.08 vs 0.08, P = 0.965), the use of CADe increased identification of nonadenomatous, nonserrated polyps per colonoscopy (0.90 vs 0.51, P < 0.0001), resulting in detection of fewer adenomas per extraction in the CADe group. The adenoma detection rate (35.9 vs 37.2%, P = 0.774) and serrated polyp detection rate (6.5 vs 6.3%, P = 1.000) were similar in the CADe and non-CADe groups. Mean withdrawal time was longer in the CADe group compared with the non-CADe group (11.7 vs 10.7 minutes, P = 0.003). However, when no polyps were identified, there was similar mean withdrawal time (9.1 vs 8.8 minutes, P = 0.288). There were no adverse events.The use of CADe did not result in a statistically significant difference in the number of adenomas detected. Additional studies are needed to better understand why some endoscopists derive substantial benefits from CADe and others do not. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT04555135.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
稚初发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
刚刚
1秒前
小豆芽儿发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
圣晟胜发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
你不知道完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
Ren完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
侦察兵发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
烂漫念文完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
Lam发布了新的文献求助30
3秒前
沙111完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
wanci应助hhh采纳,获得30
5秒前
5秒前
ATAYA发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
zhenzhen发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
娜行发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
科研通AI5应助么系么系采纳,获得10
7秒前
斯文败类应助坚果采纳,获得10
7秒前
qingkong完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
yxq完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
franklvlei完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
共享精神应助yitang采纳,获得10
10秒前
猪猪hero发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
科研通AI5应助咕噜仔采纳,获得10
10秒前
11秒前
tRNA完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
WNL发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
平淡南霜发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
共享精神应助我爱读文献采纳,获得10
12秒前
英俊的铭应助感动的世平采纳,获得10
13秒前
13秒前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 3000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Social media impact on athlete mental health: #RealityCheck 1020
Ensartinib (Ensacove) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 1000
Unseen Mendieta: The Unpublished Works of Ana Mendieta 1000
Bacterial collagenases and their clinical applications 800
El viaje de una vida: Memorias de María Lecea 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 量子力学 光电子学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3527469
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3107497
关于积分的说明 9285892
捐赠科研通 2805298
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1539865
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 716714
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 709678