Evaluation of Computer-Aided Detection During Colonoscopy in the Community (AI-SEE): A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial

结肠镜检查 医学 腺瘤 随机对照试验 内科学 胃肠病学 人口统计学的 内窥镜检查 结直肠癌 癌症 社会学 人口学
作者
Mike Wei,Uday Shankar,Russell Parvin,Syed Hasan Abbas,Sushant Chaudhary,Yishai Friedlander,Shai Friedland
出处
期刊:The American Journal of Gastroenterology [American College of Gastroenterology]
卷期号:118 (10): 1841-1847 被引量:34
标识
DOI:10.14309/ajg.0000000000002239
摘要

There has been increasing interest in artificial intelligence in gastroenterology. To reduce miss rates during colonoscopy, there has been significant exploration in computer-aided detection (CADe) devices. In this study, we evaluate the use of CADe in colonoscopy in community-based, nonacademic practices.Between September 28, 2020, and September 24, 2021, a randomized controlled trial (AI-SEE) was performed evaluating the impact of CADe on polyp detection in 4 community-based endoscopy centers in the United States Patients were block-randomized to undergoing colonoscopy with or without CADe (EndoVigilant). Primary outcomes measured were adenomas per colonoscopy and adenomas per extraction (the percentage of polyps removed that are adenomas). Secondary end points included serrated polyps per colonoscopy; nonadenomatous, nonserrated polyps per colonoscopy; adenoma and serrated polyp detection rates; and procedural time.A total of 769 patients were enrolled (387 with CADe), with similar patient demographics between the 2 groups. There was no significant difference in adenomas per colonoscopy in the CADe and non-CADe groups (0.73 vs 0.67, P = 0.496). Although the use of CADe did not improve identification of serrated polyps per colonoscopy (0.08 vs 0.08, P = 0.965), the use of CADe increased identification of nonadenomatous, nonserrated polyps per colonoscopy (0.90 vs 0.51, P < 0.0001), resulting in detection of fewer adenomas per extraction in the CADe group. The adenoma detection rate (35.9 vs 37.2%, P = 0.774) and serrated polyp detection rate (6.5 vs 6.3%, P = 1.000) were similar in the CADe and non-CADe groups. Mean withdrawal time was longer in the CADe group compared with the non-CADe group (11.7 vs 10.7 minutes, P = 0.003). However, when no polyps were identified, there was similar mean withdrawal time (9.1 vs 8.8 minutes, P = 0.288). There were no adverse events.The use of CADe did not result in a statistically significant difference in the number of adenomas detected. Additional studies are needed to better understand why some endoscopists derive substantial benefits from CADe and others do not. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT04555135.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
努力的牛油果完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
believe完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
兴奋蓝完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
充电宝应助负责念梦采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
Cloud应助Book思议采纳,获得20
3秒前
TTTTTOTOT完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
Jupiter完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
Seeone完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
DUANYIEN发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
弄青莲完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
jojo完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
小葡萄发布了新的文献求助30
6秒前
6秒前
张三完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
玛丽洁发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
小灰灰完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
慧海拾穗完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
Miracle发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
徐丹完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
Nicole完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
honghong发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
林大壮发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
9秒前
小星星完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
大模型应助xiao123789采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
满意的小鸽子完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
HH完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
七个小矮人完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
joe发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
12秒前
12秒前
高分求助中
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2800
The Young builders of New china : the visit of the delegation of the WFDY to the Chinese People's Republic 1000
юрские динозавры восточного забайкалья 800
English Wealden Fossils 700
Chen Hansheng: China’s Last Romantic Revolutionary 500
XAFS for Everyone 500
COSMETIC DERMATOLOGY & SKINCARE PRACTICE 388
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3143215
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2794316
关于积分的说明 7810682
捐赠科研通 2450507
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1303891
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 627126
版权声明 601386