Stated preferences for long-term care: a literature review

尊严 长期护理 自治 偏爱 心理学 多样性(控制论) 包裹体(矿物) 社会心理学 计算机科学 经济 政治学 精神科 人工智能 微观经济学 法学
作者
Thomas Lehnert,Max Heuchert,Katharina Hussain,Hans‐Helmut König
出处
期刊:Ageing & Society [Cambridge University Press]
卷期号:39 (9): 1873-1913 被引量:81
标识
DOI:10.1017/s0144686x18000314
摘要

ABSTRACT Person-centred provision of long-term care (LTC) requires information on how individuals value respective LTC services. The literature on LTC preferences has not been comprehensively reviewed, existing summaries are contradictory. An explorative, scoping review was conducted to provide a thorough methodological description and results synthesis of studies that empirically investigated LTC preference outcomes based on respondents’ statements. A wide search strategy, with 18 key terms relating to ‘LTC’ and 31 to ‘preferences’, was developed. Database searches in PubMed, Ovid and ScienceDirect were conducted in February 2016. The 59 studies meeting the inclusion criteria were grouped and methodically described based on preference elicitation techniques and methods. Despite substantial methodological heterogeneity between studies, certain findings consistently emerged for the investigated LTC preference outcomes. The large majority of respondents preferred to receive LTC in their known physical and social environment when care needs were moderate, but residential care when care needs were extensive. Preferences were found to depend on a variety of personal, environmental, social and cultural aspects. Dependent individuals aspired to preserve their personal and social identity, self-image, independence, autonomy, control and dignity, which suggests that LTC preferences are a function of the perceived ability of a specific LTC arrangement to satisfy peoples’ basic physiological and mental/social needs. Research on LTC preferences would greatly profit from a standardisation of respective concepts and methods.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
呆萌白竹完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
踏实的师完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
852应助哈喽酷狗采纳,获得10
3秒前
lwl发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
猪蹄强盗发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
11发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
桐桐应助可靠的寒风采纳,获得10
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
MJN完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
猪蹄强盗完成签到,获得积分20
10秒前
11秒前
komorebi发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
John完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
烟花应助小支绝不停笔采纳,获得10
15秒前
思婷老公发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
20秒前
小二郎应助ured采纳,获得10
20秒前
勤劳尔丝发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
Jasper应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
24秒前
shinysparrow应助科研通管家采纳,获得50
24秒前
香蕉觅云应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
24秒前
完美世界应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
24秒前
深情安青应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
24秒前
搜集达人应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
24秒前
24秒前
小鹿斑比完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
26秒前
殷启维完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
komorebi完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
28秒前
刘刘刘完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
云栈出谷发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
Sylvia0528完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
lalala完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
张莹发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
高分求助中
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2000
Bayesian Models of Cognition:Reverse Engineering the Mind 800
Essentials of thematic analysis 700
A Dissection Guide & Atlas to the Rabbit 600
Very-high-order BVD Schemes Using β-variable THINC Method 568
Внешняя политика КНР: о сущности внешнеполитического курса современного китайского руководства 500
Revolution und Konterrevolution in China [by A. Losowsky] 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3124628
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2774905
关于积分的说明 7724757
捐赠科研通 2430459
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1291134
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 622066
版权声明 600323