比例(比率)
内部一致性
萧条(经济学)
欧洲联盟
一致性(知识库)
人口
心理学
老人忧郁量表
人口学
精神科
临床心理学
心理测量学
抑郁症状
地理
经济
计算机科学
地图学
社会学
人工智能
国际贸易
宏观经济学
焦虑
作者
Martin Prince,Friedel M. Reischies,Aartjan T.F. Beekman,Rebecca Fuhrer,C. Jonker,Sirkka‐Liisa Kivelä,Brian Lawlor,António Lobo,H. Magnússon,Manfred M. Fichter,Herman Van Oyen,Marc Roelands,Ingmar Skoog,Cesare Turrina,J. R. M. Copeland
标识
DOI:10.1192/bjp.174.4.330
摘要
Background In an 11-country European collaboration, 14 population-based surveys included 21 724 subjects aged ⩾65 years. Most participating centres used the Geriatric Mental State (GMS), but other measures were also used. Aims To derive from these instruments a common depression symptoms scale, the EURO–D, to allow comparison of risk factor profiles between centres. Method Common items were identified from the instruments. Algorithms for fitting items to GMS were derived by observation of item correspondence or expert opinion. The resulting 12-item scale was checked for internal consistency, criterion validity and uniformity of factor-analytic profile. Results The EURO–D is internally consistent, capturing the essence of its parent instrument. A two-factor solution seemed appropriate: depression, tearfulness and wishing to die loaded on the first factor (affective suffering), and loss of interest, poor concentration and lack of enjoyment on the second (motivation) Conclusions The EURO–D scale should permit valid comparison of risk-factor associations between centres, even if between-centre variation remains difficult to attribute.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI