作者
Rui Xu,Jimei Lu,Junxian Wu,Daqing Yu,Shanshan Chu,Fengya Guan,Weiwei Liu,Jianpeng Hu,Huasheng Peng,Liangping Zha
摘要
J. Sep. Sci. 2022, 45, 5, pp.1067-1079 https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.202100924 The following errors were found and have been corrected: the sentence in “2.4.1 Sample preparation” is modified. Reference sample of atractylon was purchased from PUSH Bio-Technology (Chengdu, China). the sentence in “2.2 Chemical and reagents” is modified. The concentration of the standard solution was as follows: β-eudesmol, 3.00 mg/mL; atractylon, 1.00 mg/mL; and atractylodin, 0.93 mg/mL. the sentence in “3.2 Quantitative analysis of volatile oils in the rhizomes of A. lancea from different regions” is not given correctly. The correct sentence is: The content of β-eudesmol from HN was the highest at 41.099 mg/g, followed by those from HB and AH, which had 21.921 and 20.144 mg/g, respectively, and that of JS was lowest at 1.601 mg/g. However, the highest levels of atractylon and atractylodin were detected in the JS samples: 14.227 and 6.178 mg/g, respectively, whereas the HN samples contained 2.825 and 1.850 mg/g, respectively. No atractylon was detected in the AH and HB samples, but the AH and HB samples contained 1.721 and 1.214 mg/g of atractylodin, respectively. The total volatile oil contents consisting of the hinesol, β-eudesmol, atractylon, and atractylodin in A. lancea plants from HN, AH, HB, and JS were 78.02, 72.55, 78.13, and 55.92%, respectively, with significant differences in the main components in the rhizomes of A. lancea from each region. In addition, Table S2 and Table S3 are not given correctly. The correct tables are: