Development and Validation of the Scoring System of Appendicitis Severity 2.0

医学 阑尾炎 急性阑尾炎 前瞻性队列研究 试验预测值 临床预测规则 队列 统计的 队列研究 阿尔瓦拉多得分 放射科 内科学 外科 统计 数学
作者
Jochem C G Scheijmans,Wouter J Bom,Umme Habiba Ghori,Anna A. W. van Geloven,Gerjon Hannink,Charles C. van Rossem,Lieke van de Wouw,Peter M. Huisman,Annemiek van Hemert,Rutger J. Franken,Steven J. Oosterling,Camiel Rosman,Lianne Koens,Jaap Stoker,Marcel G. W. Dijkgraaf,Marja A. Boermeester,F Alberts,Said Bachiri,MA den Bakker,B Bisschops
出处
期刊:JAMA Surgery [American Medical Association]
卷期号:159 (6): 642-642 被引量:13
标识
DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2024.0235
摘要

Importance When considering nonoperative treatment in a patient with acute appendicitis, it is crucial to accurately rule out complicated appendicitis. The Atema score, also referred to as the Scoring System of Appendicitis Severity (SAS), has been designed to differentiate between uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis but has not been prospectively externally validated. Objective To externally validate the SAS and, in case of failure, to develop an improved SAS (2.0) for estimating the probability of complicated appendicitis. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective study included adult patients who underwent operations for suspected acute appendicitis at 11 hospitals in the Netherlands between January 2020 and August 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures Appendicitis severity was predicted according to the SAS in 795 patients and its sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) for complicated appendicitis were calculated. Since the predefined targets of 95% for both were not met, the SAS 2.0 was developed using the same cohort. This clinical prediction model was developed with multivariable regression using clinical, biochemical, and imaging findings. The SAS 2.0 was externally validated in a temporal validation cohort consisting of 565 patients. Results In total, 1360 patients were included, 463 of whom (34.5%) had complicated appendicitis. Validation of the SAS resulted in a sensitivity of 83.6% (95% CI, 78.8-87.6) and an NPV of 85.0% (95% CI, 80.6-88.8), meaning that the predefined targets were not achieved. Therefore, the SAS 2.0 was developed, internally validated (C statistic, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.84-0.89), and subsequently externally validated (C statistic, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.82-0.89). The SAS 2.0 was designed to calculate a patient’s individual probability of having complicated appendicitis along with a 95% CI. Conclusions and Relevance In this study, external validation of the SAS fell short in accurately distinguishing complicated from uncomplicated appendicitis. The newly developed and externally validated SAS 2.0 was able to assess an individual patient’s probability of having complicated appendicitis with high accuracy in patients with acute appendicitis. Use of this patient-specific risk assessment tool can be helpful when considering and discussing nonoperative treatment of acute appendicitis with patients.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
我爱木棉完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
wanci应助优美的一德采纳,获得10
4秒前
SciGPT应助yupguo采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
souley完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
领导范儿应助Function采纳,获得10
9秒前
田雨弘完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
小甘看世界完成签到,获得积分0
11秒前
wzy发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
12秒前
12秒前
14秒前
15秒前
爱打乒乓球完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
小飞飞发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
17秒前
初景应助元元元采纳,获得20
18秒前
18秒前
冷酷大白菜真实的钥匙完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
FleeToMars完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
23秒前
Refine发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
chenshiyi185发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
plusweng完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
贾111完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
31秒前
情怀应助义气莫茗采纳,获得10
31秒前
尊敬的驳完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
orange完成签到 ,获得积分10
32秒前
共享精神应助vvvv采纳,获得10
33秒前
香蕉觅云应助明理的鼠标采纳,获得10
33秒前
Lucas应助明理的鼠标采纳,获得10
33秒前
Function发布了新的文献求助10
35秒前
36秒前
领导范儿应助chenshiyi185采纳,获得10
36秒前
Ava应助龙志强采纳,获得10
37秒前
38秒前
38秒前
NexusExplorer应助优美的一德采纳,获得10
39秒前
自转无风发布了新的文献求助100
40秒前
高分求助中
液晶指向矢仿真分析数据集 8888
Invited Discussant 63O and 64O 1000
Ideology and Meaning-Making under the Putin Regime 750
Advanced Memory Technology 500
Petrology and Plate Tectonics 500
Writing Systems 500
A Handbook of User Experience Research & Design in Libraries 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 计算机科学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6864585
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8567298
关于积分的说明 18216924
捐赠科研通 6233310
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3048832
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2050505
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2026607