可比性
强制降级
透视图(图形)
生化工程
制药工业
管理科学
计算机科学
工程类
化学
生物技术
色谱法
人工智能
数学
组合数学
生物
高效液相色谱法
甲酸铵
作者
John M. Campbell,Stefano Colombo,Jamie L. Doyle,Dana I. Filoti,Göran Hübner,Laurent Magnenat,Ann K. Nowinski,Jorge Alex Pavon,Surinder Singh,Laila R. Vo,Joshua M. Woods,Elaine S. E. Stokes
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.xphs.2023.12.011
摘要
Abstract
Forced degradation, also known as stress testing, is used throughout pharmaceutical development for many purposes including assessing the comparability of biopharmaceutical products according to ICH Guideline Q5E. These formal comparability studies, the results of which are submitted to health authorities, investigate potential impacts of manufacturing process changes on the quality, safety, and efficacy of the drug. Despite the wide use of forced degradation in comparability assessments, detailed guidance on the design and interpretation of such studies is scarce. The BioPhorum Development Group is an industry-wide consortium enabling networking and sharing of common practices for the development of biopharmaceuticals. The BioPhorum Development Group Forced Degradation Workstream recently conducted several group discussions and a benchmarking survey to understand current industry approaches for the use of forced degradation studies to assess comparability of protein-based biopharmaceuticals. The results provide insight into the design of forced degradation studies, analytical characterization and testing strategies, data evaluation criteria, as well as some considerations and differences for non-platform modalities (e.g., non-traditional mAbs). This article presents survey responses from several global companies of various sizes and provides an industry perspective and experience regarding the practicalities of using forced degradation to assess comparability.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI