Does Nociception Level Index-Guided Opioid Administration Reduce Intraoperative Opioid Consumption? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

医学 荟萃分析 类阿片 置信区间 严格标准化平均差 随机对照试验 麻醉 统计的 内科学 统计 受体 数学
作者
Muhammet Selman Söğüt,İlayda Kalyoncu,Muhammet Ahmet Karakaya,Mete Manıcı,Kamil Darçın
出处
期刊:Anesthesia & Analgesia [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
卷期号:139 (5): 978-985 被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.1213/ane.0000000000007180
摘要

BACKGROUND: The nociception level (NOL) index is a quantitative parameter derived from physiological signals to measure intraoperative nociception. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate if NOL monitoring reduces intraoperative opioid use compared to conventional therapy (opioid administered at clinician discretion). METHODS: This meta-analysis comprises randomized clinical trials comparing NOL-guided opioid administration to conventional therapy in adult patients undergoing any type of surgery. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and CENTRAL databases was conducted. The primary outcome was intraoperative opioid consumption and the effect estimate of the NOL index was measured using the standardized mean difference (SMD) where 0.20 is considered a small and 0.80 a large effect size. A random-effects model with Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman adjustment was applied to estimate the treatment effect. Heterogeneity was explored clinically and statistically (using the inconsistency I ² statistic, prediction intervals, and influence analysis). The quality (certainty) of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) guidelines methodology. RESULTS: This review comprised 9 trials (519 patients). The intraoperative opioid SMD (NOL monitoring versus conventional therapy) was −0.26 (95% confidence interval [CI], −0.82 to 0.30; P = .31; low certainty of evidence). We observed substantial clinical (intraoperative opioid regimens) and statistical heterogeneity with the I ² statistic being 86% (95% CI, 75%–92%). The prediction interval was between −1.95 and 1.42 indicating where the SMD between NOL and conventional therapy would lie if a similar study were conducted in the future. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis does not provide evidence supporting the role of NOL monitoring in reducing intraoperative opioid consumption.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
1秒前
笨男孩发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
wanghao发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
陈湫完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
田様应助等待的寒松采纳,获得10
3秒前
害怕的白竹完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
随心完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
怕孤单的嚣完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
lcxw1224完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
长常九久发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
15503116087发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
大个应助初之采纳,获得10
7秒前
te发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
边港洋完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
凤羽发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
灵巧听露发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
可爱的函函应助猫猫无敌采纳,获得10
12秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
13秒前
14秒前
爆米花应助刁弘睿采纳,获得10
14秒前
14秒前
14秒前
缥缈海云完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
斯文败类应助沙场秋点兵采纳,获得10
16秒前
123完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
17秒前
无辜问玉发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
17秒前
18秒前
谨慎乐安发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
20秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
缥缈海云发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 2000
The Cambridge History of China: Volume 4, Sui and T'ang China, 589–906 AD, Part Two 1000
The Composition and Relative Chronology of Dynasties 16 and 17 in Egypt 1000
Russian Foreign Policy: Change and Continuity 800
Real World Research, 5th Edition 800
Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo By Jenine Beekhuyzen, Pat Bazeley · 2024 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5718021
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5250051
关于积分的说明 15284272
捐赠科研通 4868198
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2614063
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1563973
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1521425