Early prediction of sepsis in emergency department patients using various methods and scoring systems

Abstract Background Early recognition of sepsis, a common life‐threatening condition in intensive care units (ICUs), is beneficial for improving patient outcomes. However, most sepsis prediction models were trained and assessed in the ICU, which might not apply to emergency department (ED) settings. Aim To establish an early predictive model based on basic but essential information collected upon ED presentation for the follow‐up diagnosis of sepsis observed in the ICU. Study Design This study developed and validated a reliable model of sepsis prediction among ED patients by comparing 10 different methods based on retrospective electronic health record data from the MIMIC‐IV database. In‐ICU sepsis was identified as the primary outcome. The potential predictors encompassed baseline demographics, vital signs, pain scale, chief complaints and Emergency Severity Index (ESI). 80% and 20% of the total of 425 737 ED visit records were randomly selected for the train set and the test set for model development and validation, respectively. Results Among the methods evaluated, XGBoost demonstrated an optimal predictive performance with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.90–0.91). Logistic regression exhibited a comparable predictive ability to XGBoost, with an AUC of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.89–0.90), along with a sensitivity and specificity of 85% (95% CI: 0.83–0.86) and 78% (95% CI: 0.77–0.80), respectively. Neither of the five commonly used severity scoring systems demonstrated satisfactory performance for sepsis prediction. The predictive ability of using ESI as the sole predictor (AUC: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.78–0.80) was also inferior to the model integrating ESI and other basic information. Conclusions The use of ESI combined with basic clinical information upon ED presentation accurately predicted sepsis among ED patients, strengthening its application in ED. Relevance to Clinical Practice The proposed model may assist nurses in risk stratification management and prioritize interventions for potential sepsis patients, even in low‐resource settings.