The quest for GRACE 3.0: improving our beloved risk score with machine learning

医学 急性冠脉综合征 逻辑回归 接收机工作特性 判别式 内科学 弗雷明翰风险评分 心肌梗塞 曲线下面积 推导 回顾性队列研究 心脏病学 人工智能 疾病 计算机科学 动脉
作者
José Pedro Sousa,Aldo Â. M. Lima,Paulo Gil,J. Henriques,Lino Gonçalves
出处
期刊:European Heart Journal [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:42 (Supplement_1)
标识
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.1094
摘要

Abstract Background Although widely recommended for risk assessment of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score famously lacks discriminative power. On the other hand, in-hospital serum hemoglobin levels (HG) have been shown to simultaneously forecast both thrombotic and hemorrhagic hazards. Purpose To ascertain the extent to which the incorporation of HG in the GRACE score is able to increase its predictive ability. Methods Retrospective single-center study encompassing ACS patients consecutively admitted to a Cardiac Intensive Care Unit. Inclusion criteria comprised the acquaintance of GRACE score, HG and vital status on a 6-month follow-up, which served as the outcome. 3 discriminative models were first created: (standard) GRACE score (model 1); GRACE score plus HG, by means of logistic regression (model 2); GRACE score plus HG, by means of multilayer perceptron (a class of feedforward artificial neural network) (model 3). Hereafter, if models 2 and/or 3 were to be found significantly more discriminative than model 1, a correction factor would be calculated, also allowing for the conception of the most predictive model possible (model 4). The discriminative ability was estimated by both the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC), and the dyad sensitivity/specificity. Results Between April 2009 and December 2016, 1468 patients met study inclusion criteria. Mean age was 68.0±13.2 years and 29.8% were female, while 36.9% presented with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Mean GRACE score was 145.5±47.0 and mean HG was 13.5±2.0. All-cause mortality reached 10.5%, at 6 months. Predictive power for models 1, 2 and 3 may be quantified as follows: AUC 0.6998, sensitivity 77.7% and specificity 62.5%; AUC 0.7818, sensitivity 36.3% and specificity 92.2%; AUC 0.7851, sensitivity 47.7% and specificity 88.5%, respectively. Both models 2 and 3 exhibited more discriminative ability than model 1 (p<0.001), due to their higher specificity. As such, a correction factor was computed (y = −7.8556x + 86.4117) and model 4 was created, displaying a sensitivity of 65.9% and a specificity of 76.5%. Conclusion HG single-handedly provides incremental predictive value – namely more specificity – to the GRACE score. In particular, the latter seems to overestimate ACS patients' risk if HG is normal or close to normal. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
奋斗的雪曼完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
粗心的飞槐完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
LELE完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
了0完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
apocalypse完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
guhao完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
指导灰完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
善良的火完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
优雅夕阳完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
Jasper应助光亮的自行车采纳,获得10
30秒前
miki完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
糖宝完成签到 ,获得积分10
39秒前
KX2024完成签到,获得积分10
42秒前
松松发布了新的文献求助20
45秒前
nusiew完成签到,获得积分10
45秒前
huiluowork完成签到 ,获得积分10
46秒前
陶醉的翠霜完成签到 ,获得积分10
46秒前
46秒前
冷静如松完成签到 ,获得积分10
53秒前
55秒前
浮云完成签到 ,获得积分10
56秒前
屈岂愈完成签到,获得积分10
57秒前
1分钟前
Pupil完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
偏偏意气用事完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
安安完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
cttc完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
Chnimike完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
红茸茸羊完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
年轻千愁完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
liu完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
Wanyeweiyu完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
Fury完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
风中幻梦完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
bigpluto完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
是谁还没睡完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
高分求助中
【提示信息,请勿应助】关于scihub 10000
Les Mantodea de Guyane: Insecta, Polyneoptera [The Mantids of French Guiana] 3000
徐淮辽南地区新元古代叠层石及生物地层 3000
The Mother of All Tableaux: Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 3000
Handbook of Industrial Diamonds.Vol2 1100
Global Eyelash Assessment scale (GEA) 1000
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 550
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4038066
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3575779
关于积分的说明 11373801
捐赠科研通 3305584
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1819239
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 892655
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 815022