Relationship Between Cognitive Frailty and Mortality in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

医学 奇纳 荟萃分析 危险系数 子群分析 科克伦图书馆 认知 老年学 梅德林 人口学 内科学 置信区间 精神科 心理干预 法学 社会学 政治学
作者
Yiming Qiu,Guichen Li,Lufang Zheng,Wei Liu,Xin Li,Xinxin Wang,Li Chen
出处
期刊:Journal of the American Medical Directors Association [Elsevier]
卷期号:24 (11): 1637-1644.e8 被引量:20
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2023.08.001
摘要

Abstract

Objective

To synthesize the pooled mortality risk estimate and determine whether cognitive frailty is a predictor of mortality.

Design

A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Setting and Participants

The participants were community-dwelling older adults aged ≥60 years.

Methods

PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched. Two researchers independently screened potentially eligible literature, evaluated the quality of the included studies, and then extracted the data. We used STATA, version 15.0 to perform the all data.

Results

Nineteen studies were included. The association between cognitive frailty and a higher risk of death was statistically significant [hazard ratio (HR), 2.01; 95% CI, 1.84–2.19; P < .001]. The outcomes indicated that cognitive frailty was a critical risk factor for predicting mortality (OR, 4.82; 95% CI, 1.59–14.57; P < .01). Based on different models of cognitive frailty, the results of subgroup analyses revealed that the risk of mortality was the highest in the Frail + mild cognitive impairment group (HR, 2.35; 95% CI, 2.05–2.70; P < .001). The subgroup analyses by region demonstrated that mortality risk was lowest in the European group (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.4–1.87; P < .001).

Conclusions and Implications

This study quantitatively portrays the pooled mortality risk estimate of cognitive frailty. The results suggest that in older adults, cognitive frailty can be a predictor of mortality. The findings could alert health care providers to pay more attention to cognitive frailty.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
章鱼完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
箴言发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
早茶可口完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
大个应助乐观小之采纳,获得10
3秒前
健壮的黑猫完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
无极微光应助Weiyu采纳,获得20
3秒前
tuanheqi应助细腻天蓝采纳,获得50
4秒前
周静茹发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
sw完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
闾丘道天完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
mingzzz1发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
乐观若烟完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
haha发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
十一发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
zHu1完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
下隔热不完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
zzz完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
李健的小迷弟应助小标采纳,获得30
10秒前
10秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
mingzzz1完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
forever发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
Boston完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
大力帽子应助yyy采纳,获得10
11秒前
Owen应助hang采纳,获得10
11秒前
xftx完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
嗯呐发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
高分求助中
2025-2031全球及中国金刚石触媒粉行业研究及十五五规划分析报告 12000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Cambridge History of China: Volume 4, Sui and T'ang China, 589–906 AD, Part Two 1000
The Composition and Relative Chronology of Dynasties 16 and 17 in Egypt 1000
Russian Foreign Policy: Change and Continuity 800
Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo By Jenine Beekhuyzen, Pat Bazeley · 2024 800
Advanced Memory Technology: Functional Materials and Devices 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5692559
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5089055
关于积分的说明 15208836
捐赠科研通 4849783
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2601280
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1553052
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1511274