Efficacy and Safety of Erector Spinae Plane Block versus Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery

医学 荟萃分析 不利影响 麻醉 外科 梅德林 块(置换群论) 神经阻滞 类阿片 系统回顾 内科学 几何学 数学 受体 政治学 法学
作者
Qing Peng,Bo Meng,Sheng Yang,Zhenghu Ban,Yu Zhang,Man Hu,Wenjie Zhao,Haisheng Wu,Yuping Tao,Liang Zhang
出处
期刊:The Clinical Journal of Pain [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.1097/ajp.0000000000001177
摘要

Objectives: As two novel peripheral nerve blocks, the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block can relieve postoperative pain in spinal surgery. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of ESPB versus TLIP block in patients undergoing spine surgery. Methods: An extensive search of English online databases, including PubMed, Web of Sciences, Embase, Medline and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Chinese online databases like Wanfang Data, CNKI and CQVIP until March 31, 2023, with no language restrictions was performed. This systematic review and meta-analysis are based on the PRISMA statement and has been registered on PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) with registered ID: CRD42023420987. Results: Five studies involving 457 patients were eligible for this study. Compared with TLIP block, ESPB had lower postoperative opioid consumption at postoperative 48 hours (SMD=−1.31, 95% CI=−2.54 to −0.08, P =0.04, I 2 =80%) and postoperative pain score at postoperative 24 hours (SMD=−0.72, 95% CI=−1.43 to −0.02, P =0.04, I 2 =95%) in patients undergoing spine surgery. Complications associated with ESPB and TLIP block were not reported in the included studies. Discussion: ESPB and TLIP block are two novel and effective block methods. Patients receiving ESPB had lower postoperative opioid consumption and postoperative pain score compared with patients receiving TLIP block, there was no significant difference between the two groups in intraoperative opioid consumption, adverse events and rescue analgesia.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
大个应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
刚刚
脑洞疼应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
刚刚
搜集达人应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
科研通AI6应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
充电宝应助北阳采纳,获得10
1秒前
情怀应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
bkagyin应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
科研通AI6应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
科研通AI6应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
Jasper应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
墨白完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
星辰大海应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
科研通AI6应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
乐乐应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
哎呀呀完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
Owen应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
天天快乐应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
JamesPei应助99v587采纳,获得10
2秒前
852应助chenyinglin采纳,获得10
2秒前
李存发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
我的miemie发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
软耳兔的信箱完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
黑山羊发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
畅快山兰发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
缥缈纲发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
Cactus应助秋浱采纳,获得10
4秒前
猫好好完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
ljjxd完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
PaoPao发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
你好完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
Layman发布了新的文献求助30
6秒前
夏桑菊泡面完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
zoudegui完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
计划经济时代的工厂管理与工人状况(1949-1966)——以郑州市国营工厂为例 500
INQUIRY-BASED PEDAGOGY TO SUPPORT STEM LEARNING AND 21ST CENTURY SKILLS: PREPARING NEW TEACHERS TO IMPLEMENT PROJECT AND PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING 500
The Pedagogical Leadership in the Early Years (PLEY) Quality Rating Scale 410
Modern Britain, 1750 to the Present (第2版) 300
Writing to the Rhythm of Labor Cultural Politics of the Chinese Revolution, 1942–1976 300
Lightning Wires: The Telegraph and China's Technological Modernization, 1860-1890 250
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 催化作用 遗传学 冶金 电极 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4600144
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4010398
关于积分的说明 12416277
捐赠科研通 3690163
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2034179
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1067543
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 952426