Clinical analysis of prophylactic para-aortic intensity-modulated radiation in cervical cancer

This study aimed to compare the survival and toxicity of patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage IB1-IIIC cervical cancer without common iliac node metastasis treated with extended-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (EF-IMRT) or pelvic IMRT (P-IMRT).Thirty-one patients treated with EF-IMRT and 37 patients who underwent P-IMRT were analysed retrospectively. Both groups were treated with high-dose-rate 192Ir two-dimensional brachytherapy and concurrent chemotherapy. The chi-square test and Kaplan-Meier method were used to compare toxicity and survival between the two groups.The median follow-up time of EF-IMRT group and P-IMRT group was 22 and 30 months, respectively. The 3-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and para-aortic lymph node metastasis-free survival (PAMFS) in the EF-IMRT group and P-IMRT group were 87% versus 74.6%, 83.6% versus 61.7%, and 96% versus 80.5%, respectively. Treatment regimens, tumour size, and radiation time were independent prognostic factors of OS and PFS. Treatment regimens, tumour size, and total equivalent dose in 2 Gy/f (EQD2) of point A were independent prognostic factors of PAMFS. Five patients in the EF-IMRT group and 14 patients in P-IMET group experienced treatment failure. The cumulative incidence of grade 3 and 4 acute leukopenia in the EF-IMRT group was 51.6%, in comparison with 27.03% in the pelvic group. No difference was found in thrombocytopenia between two groups.Patients with FIGO 2009 stage IB1-IIIC cervical cancer without common iliac node metastases may be benefit from EF-IMRT. Notably, EF-IMRT exhibits increased toxicity incidence; however, this remains within an acceptable range.