医学
脚踝
负重
运动范围
随机对照试验
并发症
外科
物理疗法
作者
S.F. Baumbach,Kathrin Rellensmann,Fabian T. Spindler,Wolfgang Böcker,Alexej Barg,Thomas Mittlmeier,Sabine Ochman,Stefan Rammelt,Hans Polzer
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.fas.2023.04.006
摘要
This systematic literature review compared weight bearing (WB) vs. partial- / non-weight bearing (NWB) and mobilization (MB) vs. immobilization (IMB) for surgically treated ankle fractures. Five databases were searched. Eligible were (quasi-)randomized controlled trials comparing at least two different postoperative treatment protocols. The risk of bias was assessed using the RoB-2 toolkit. The primary outcome was complication rate, secondary outcome Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), range of motion (ROM), and return to work (RTW). Out of 10,345 studies, 24 papers were eligible. Thirteen studies (n = 853) compared WB/NWB, 13 studies (n = 706) MB/IMB with a moderate study quality. WB did not increase the risk for complications but resulted in superior short-term outcomes for OMAS, ROM, RTW. 12 studies found no inferior results for MB compared to IMB. Early and immediate WB and MB do not increase the complication rates but result in superior short term outcome scores. Level I Systematic Review
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI