医学
奇纳
数据提取
严厉
梅德林
批判性评价
灰色文学
医学教育
主题分析
系统回顾
医疗保健
利益相关者
护理部
心理干预
定性研究
替代医学
公共关系
政治学
经济增长
数学
法学
经济
几何学
社会学
病理
社会科学
作者
Jenna Lang,Melanie Paykel,Kimberley Haines,Carol Hodgson
出处
期刊:Critical Care Medicine
[Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
日期:2020-09-18
卷期号:48 (11): e1121-e1128
被引量:144
标识
DOI:10.1097/ccm.0000000000004574
摘要
Despite significant variation in the methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines for early mobilization, there were important consistencies in recommendations internationally. Future research should address gaps related to patient selection, dosage, team culture, and expertise. Future clinical practice guidelines in this area should focus on engagement of patients and families in the development process and provision of resources to support implementation based on the consideration of known barriers and facilitators.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI