Should scintigraphy be completely excluded from the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection

AIM To analyse the diagnostic performance of bone and leukocyte scintigraphy for periprosthetic joint infection before excluding the test from routine practice, and to analyse the possible benefit of bone marrow scintigraphy in inconclusive cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS From 2012 to 2018, all patients with a total hip or knee arthroplasty who had a bone and leukocyte scintigraphy performed and underwent revision surgery were included. Bone marrow scintigraphy was indicated only in cases in which bone and leukocyte scintigraphy were inconclusive. Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection was confirmed by positive intraoperative cultures after revision surgery. RESULTS A total of 105 patients were included. Eighteen patients had total hip arthroplasties (18.1%) and 86 had total knee arthroplasties (81.9%). Mean age was 74 years. Nineteen cases were diagnosed with a periprosthetic joint infection. Bone and leukocyte scintigraphy had 64% sensitivity and 97% specificity. Bone marrow scintigraphy increased sensitivity and specificity to 88% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION Bone and leukocyte scintigraphy possesses high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of chronic periprosthetic joint infection. The additional use of bone marrow scintigraphy significantly increases diagnostic performance. For these reasons, bone scintigraphy is reserved for inconclusive cases of chronic periprosthetic joint infection.