医学
危险系数
置信区间
结直肠癌
回顾性队列研究
风险因素
转移
癌症
内科学
外科
远处转移
作者
Erik Agger,Fredrik Jörgren,Marie‐Louise Lydrup,Pamela Buchwald
出处
期刊:Annals of Surgery
[Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
日期:2023-01-10
卷期号:277 (2): e346-e352
被引量:11
标识
DOI:10.1097/sla.0000000000005302
摘要
To evaluate circumferential resection margin (CRM) as a risk factor for distant metastasis (DM) in rectal cancer.The treatment of rectal cancer has evolved over the last decades. Surgical radicality is considered the most important factor in preventing recurrences including local and distant. CRM ≤1.0 mm is considered to increase recurrence risk. This study explores the risk of DM in relation to exact CRM.All patients treated with abdominal resection surgery for rectal cancer between 2005 and 2013 in Sweden were eligible for inclusion in this retrospective study. Primary endpoint was DM.Twelve thousand one hundred forty-six cases were identified. Eight thousand five hundred ninety-three cases were analyzed after exclusion. Seven hundred seventeen (8.6%) patients had CRM ≤1.0mm and 7577 (91.4%) patients had CRM >1.0 mm. DM recurrence rate at 5 years was 42.1% (95% CI 32.5-50.3), 31.5% (95% CI 27.3-35.5), 25.8% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 16.2-34.4), and 19.5% (95% CI 18.5-19.5) when CRM was 0.0 mm, 0.1 to 1.0 mm, 1.1 to 1.9 mm, and CRM ≥2mm, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed higher DM risk in CRM 0.0-1.0 mm versus >1.0 mm (hazard ratio 1.30, 95% CI 1.05-1.60; P = 0.015). No significant difference in DM risk in CRM 1.1-1.9 mm versus ≥2.0 mm (hazard ratio 0.66, 95% CI 0.34-1.28; P = 0.224) could be detected.The risk of DM decreases with increasing CRM. Moreover, CRM ≤1.0 mm is a significant risk factor for DM. Thus, CRM is a dominant factor when discussing risk of DM after rectal cancer surgery.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI