The efficacy of psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies for mental disorders in adults: an umbrella review and meta‐analytic evaluation of recent meta‐analyses

荟萃分析 医学 精神科 随机对照试验 心理信息 出版偏见 焦虑 重性抑郁障碍 科克伦图书馆 双相情感障碍 系统回顾 梅德林 临床心理学 内科学 心情 法学 政治学
作者
Falk Leichsenring,Christiane Steinert,Sven Rabung,John P. A. Ioannidis
出处
期刊:World Psychiatry [Wiley]
卷期号:21 (1): 133-145 被引量:285
标识
DOI:10.1002/wps.20941
摘要

Mental disorders represent a worldwide public health concern. Psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies are recommended as first line treatments. However, evidence has emerged that their efficacy may be overestimated, due to a variety of shortcomings in clinical trials (e.g., publication bias, weak control conditions such as waiting list). We performed an umbrella review of recent meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies for the main mental disorders in adults. We selected meta-analyses that formally assessed risk of bias or quality of studies, excluded weak comparators, and used effect sizes for target symptoms as primary outcome. We searched PubMed and PsycINFO and individual records of the Cochrane Library for meta-analyses published between January 2014 and March 2021 comparing psychotherapies or pharmacotherapies with placebo or treatment-as-usual (TAU), or psychotherapies vs. pharmacotherapies head-to-head, or the combination of psychotherapy with pharmacotherapy to either monotherapy. One hundred and two meta-analyses, encompassing 3,782 RCTs and 650,514 patients, were included, covering depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, somatoform disorders, eating disorders, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, substance use disorders, insomnia, schizophrenia spectrum disorders, and bipolar disorder. Across disorders and treatments, the majority of effect sizes for target symptoms were small. A random effect meta-analytic evaluation of the effect sizes reported by the largest meta-analyses per disorder yielded a standardized mean difference (SMD) of 0.34 (95% CI: 0.26-0.42) for psychotherapies and 0.36 (95% CI: 0.32-0.41) for pharmacotherapies compared with placebo or TAU. The SMD for head-to-head comparisons of psychotherapies vs. pharmacotherapies was 0.11 (95% CI: -0.05 to 0.26). The SMD for the combined treatment compared with either monotherapy was 0.31 (95% CI: 0.19-0.44). Risk of bias was often high. After more than half a century of research, thousands of RCTs and millions of invested funds, the effect sizes of psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies for mental disorders are limited, suggesting a ceiling effect for treatment research as presently conducted. A paradigm shift in research seems to be required to achieve further progress.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
66完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
青4096发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
李健应助LIU采纳,获得10
1秒前
cqwllllyh完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
激昂的南烟完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
搜集达人应助qyang采纳,获得10
4秒前
renshiq完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
7秒前
eric完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
机械小白完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
SONG完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
青4096完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
生如夏花完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
LIU发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
brightmys完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
qyang发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
rosy完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
20秒前
科研通AI5应助kunner采纳,获得10
22秒前
在水一方应助ZM采纳,获得10
23秒前
火星上的菲鹰应助沫沫采纳,获得10
23秒前
25秒前
moiaoh完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
123完成签到,获得积分20
26秒前
zhoushixian发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
xzxz发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
31秒前
传奇3应助现代鸣凤采纳,获得10
31秒前
科研通AI5应助杨烨华采纳,获得10
35秒前
kunner完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
36秒前
37秒前
41秒前
TT完成签到,获得积分10
41秒前
41秒前
42秒前
43秒前
高分求助中
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine Board Review 1000
こんなに痛いのにどうして「なんでもない」と医者にいわれてしまうのでしょうか 510
The First Nuclear Era: The Life and Times of a Technological Fixer 500
岡本唐貴自伝的回想画集 500
Distinct Aggregation Behaviors and Rheological Responses of Two Terminally Functionalized Polyisoprenes with Different Quadruple Hydrogen Bonding Motifs 450
Ciprofol versus propofol for adult sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3670801
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3227675
关于积分的说明 9776795
捐赠科研通 2937868
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1609663
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 760441
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 735928