A prospective pilot comparison of wet and dry heparinized suction for EUS-guided liver biopsy (with videos)

Background and Aims As EUS-guided liver biopsy sampling (EUS-LB) becomes more widely used, further studies have investigated ways to improve tissue yields. Use of a heparin-primed needle may lead to less clotting of blood within the needle, improve tissue recovery, and decrease fragmentation. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate wet suction using a heparin-primed needle for EUS-LB. Methods This was a prospective crossover study evaluating wet suction for EUS-LB in parenchymal liver disease. The primary outcome was specimen adequacy, defined by an aggregate specimen length ≥15 mm and ≥5 complete portal tracts (CPTs). Secondary outcomes included number of CPTs, length of the longest piece, aggregate specimen length, and number of small (≤4 mm), medium (5-8 mm), and large (≥9 mm) fragments. Adverse events were tracked at 7 and 30 days. Results One hundred twenty biopsy specimens were collected from 40 participants (3 specimens per patient). Specimen adequacy occurred in 39 wet heparin (98%), 37 dry heparin (93%), and 30 dry needle biopsy samples (80%; 95% confidence interval [CI], .14-.18; P = .01). There was no difference between dry needle techniques. Length of the longest piece was 8.9 mm for wet heparin and 5.8 mm for dry techniques (95% CI, .33-1.53; P = .003). Aggregate specimen length was 49.2 mm for wet heparin and 23.9 mm for dry heparin (95% CI, -46.34 to 44.94; P = .003). Mean CPT count was 7.0 for wet heparin versus 4.0 for dry (95% CI, .74-6.26; P = .01). There were more medium (2.0 vs 1.0; 95% CI, .06-1.24; P = .03) and large (1.0 versus 0.0; 95% CI, .33-1.53; P = .003) fragments with wet suction with no difference in small fragments between groups. Conclusions The use of wet suction EUS-LB demonstrated improved tissue adequacy compared with dry needle techniques. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03103997.) As EUS-guided liver biopsy sampling (EUS-LB) becomes more widely used, further studies have investigated ways to improve tissue yields. Use of a heparin-primed needle may lead to less clotting of blood within the needle, improve tissue recovery, and decrease fragmentation. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate wet suction using a heparin-primed needle for EUS-LB. This was a prospective crossover study evaluating wet suction for EUS-LB in parenchymal liver disease. The primary outcome was specimen adequacy, defined by an aggregate specimen length ≥15 mm and ≥5 complete portal tracts (CPTs). Secondary outcomes included number of CPTs, length of the longest piece, aggregate specimen length, and number of small (≤4 mm), medium (5-8 mm), and large (≥9 mm) fragments. Adverse events were tracked at 7 and 30 days. One hundred twenty biopsy specimens were collected from 40 participants (3 specimens per patient). Specimen adequacy occurred in 39 wet heparin (98%), 37 dry heparin (93%), and 30 dry needle biopsy samples (80%; 95% confidence interval [CI], .14-.18; P = .01). There was no difference between dry needle techniques. Length of the longest piece was 8.9 mm for wet heparin and 5.8 mm for dry techniques (95% CI, .33-1.53; P = .003). Aggregate specimen length was 49.2 mm for wet heparin and 23.9 mm for dry heparin (95% CI, -46.34 to 44.94; P = .003). Mean CPT count was 7.0 for wet heparin versus 4.0 for dry (95% CI, .74-6.26; P = .01). There were more medium (2.0 vs 1.0; 95% CI, .06-1.24; P = .03) and large (1.0 versus 0.0; 95% CI, .33-1.53; P = .003) fragments with wet suction with no difference in small fragments between groups. The use of wet suction EUS-LB demonstrated improved tissue adequacy compared with dry needle techniques. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03103997.)