A Methodological Comparison between Ultrasound and X-ray Evaluations of Bone Age

骨龄 骨骺 超声波 射线照相术 医学 尺骨 重复性 口腔正畸科 年龄组 核医学 放射科 外科 数学 解剖 统计 人口学 社会学
作者
Jianping Wang
出处
期刊:Journal of Sports Sciences [Taylor & Francis]
被引量:5
摘要

The most conventional method of skeletal age assessment in children and adolescents uses CHN standards to evaluate the left hand radiograph.But a newly developed ultrasound device(BonAge System,made by Sunlight Medical Ltd.,Israel) has been widely put in use of skeletal growth evaluation.Objective: to compare the accuracy of the ultrasound method with the standard radiographic method.Participants: 322 children and adolescents aged 5-17 years,127 girls,195 boys.Materials and methods: 1)An repeated ultrasound examination of 93 participants' distal radial and ulna epiphysis was made to evaluate the new device's repeatability and stability.2) 229 participants underwent radiography of the left hand,followed by ultrasound measurement of the same hand using BonAge system.This system evaluates the relationship between the velocity of sound passing thorough the distal radial and ulna epiphysis and growth.Two experienced experts,blinded to each other and to the chronological age and BonAge result,analyzed the radiograph and gave out their own judgment of bone age according to CHN standards.The correlation between BonAge result and averaged specialists' judgments was analyzed.Results: 1)There was high correlation and no significant difference between the average of two repeated BonAge results.The device was quite stable in use.2) There were great systematic error and random error between the average values of ultrasound and radiograph bone ages not only in gender groups but in age groups as well.The error was enlarged with age older.The univariate analysis for one dependent variable by multi-factors showed that bone age results were mainly influenced by such factors as evaluation methods and age,but were not significantly related to gender.The results by two methods were also not highly correlatted especially for those older participants,so we cannot built a good linear regression relationship between the evaluation outcomes of two methods.Conclusion: There were great methodological differences between the principles of the BonAge and radiograph.The two methods can not be replaced each other.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
欣欣子发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
天狼星冷静的花椒完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
哈哈哈哈完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
俊逸鹏笑发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
Mia发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
学术路上努力前进的牛马完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
zzyy完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
囚徒发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
Jasper应助sure采纳,获得10
3秒前
327完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
研友_Raven完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
缥缈半烟完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
necromorph发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
guovivi发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
7秒前
哈基米德应助张小秉采纳,获得20
7秒前
聪慧若风完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
ywyw完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
遇上彩虹发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
Jasper应助Gbn采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
享音完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
科目三应助yi采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
chanvze完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
黙宇循光发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
打打应助丰富青文采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
JayeChen发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
xxfsx举报满意的胡萝卜求助涉嫌违规
12秒前
12秒前
shinble发布了新的文献求助30
13秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Pipeline and riser loss of containment 2001 - 2020 (PARLOC 2020) 1000
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 500
A Manual for the Identification of Plant Seeds and Fruits : Second revised edition 500
Refractory Castable Engineering 400
Modern Britain, 1750 to the Present (求助第2版!!!) 400
Social work values and ethics (6th ed.) 360
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 内科学 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 纳米技术 遗传学 基因 复合材料 化学工程 物理化学 病理 催化作用 免疫学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5180491
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4367921
关于积分的说明 13600823
捐赠科研通 4218743
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2313774
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1312578
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1261128