Intraoperative irradiation for early breast cancer (ELIOT): long-term recurrence and survival outcomes from a single-centre, randomised, phase 3 equivalence trial

医学 临床终点 放射治疗 乳腺癌 剂量分馏 临床试验 保乳手术 随机对照试验 内科学 外科 肿瘤科 癌症 乳房切除术
作者
Roberto Orecchia,Umberto Veronesi,Patrick Maisonneuve,Viviana Galimberti,Roberta Lazzari,Paolo Veronesi,Barbara Alicja Jereczek‐Fossa,Federica Cattani,Claudia Sangalli,Alberto Luini,Pietro Caldarella,Marco Venturino,Daniele Sances,Stefano Zurrida,Giuseppe Viale,Maria Cristina Leonardi,Mattia Intra
出处
期刊:Lancet Oncology [Elsevier]
卷期号:22 (5): 597-608 被引量:161
标识
DOI:10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00080-2
摘要

Background In the randomised, phase 3 equivalence trial on electron intraoperative radiotherapy (ELIOT), accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) with the use of intraoperative radiotherapy was associated with a higher rate of ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence (IBTR) than whole-breast irradiation (WBI) in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Here, we aimed to examine the planned long-term recurrence and survival outcomes from the ELIOT trial. Methods This single-centre, randomised, phase 3 equivalence trial was done at the European Institute of Oncology (Milan, Italy). Eligible women, aged 48–75 years with a clinical diagnosis of a unicentric breast carcinoma with an ultrasound diameter not exceeding 25 mm, clinically negative axillary lymph nodes, and who were suitable for breast-conserving surgery, were randomly assigned (1:1) via a web-based system, with a random permuted block design (block size of 16) and stratified by clinical tumour size, to receive post-operative WBI with conventional fractionation (50 Gy given as 25 fractions of 2 Gy, plus a 10 Gy boost), or 21 Gy intraoperative radiotherapy with electrons (ELIOT) in a single dose to the tumour bed during surgery. The trial was open label and no-one was masked to treatment group assignment. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of IBTR. The trial was designed assuming a 5-year IBTR rate of 3% in the WBI group and equivalence of the two groups, if the 5-year IBTR rate in the ELIOT group did not exceed a 2·5 times excess, corresponding to 7·5%. Overall survival was the secondary endpoint. The main analysis was done by intention to treat. The cumulative incidence of IBTR events and overall survival were assessed at 5, 10, and 15 years of follow-up. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01849133. Findings Between Nov 20, 2000, and Dec 27, 2007, 1305 women were enrolled and randomly assigned: 654 to the WBI group and 651 to the ELIOT group. After a median follow-up of 12·4 years (IQR 9·7–14·7), 86 (7%) patients developed IBTR, with 70 (11%) cases in the ELIOT group and 16 (2%) in the WBI group, corresponding to an absolute excess of 54 IBTRs in the ELIOT group (HR 4·62, 95% CI 2·68–7·95, p<0·0001). In the ELIOT group, the 5-year IBTR rate was 4·2% (95% CI 2·8–5·9), the 10-year rate was 8·1% (6·1–10·3), and the 15-year rate was 12·6% (9·8–15·9). In the WBI group, the 5-year IBTR rate was 0·5% (95% CI 0·1–1·3), the 10-year rate was 1·1% (0·5–2·2), and the 15-year rate was 2·4% (1·4–4·0). At final follow-up on March 11, 2019, 193 (15%) women had died from any cause, with no difference between the two groups (98 deaths in the ELIOT group vs 95 in the WBI group; HR 1·03, 95% CI 0·77–1·36, p=0·85). In the ELIOT group, the overall survival rate was 96·8% (95% CI 95·1–97·9) at 5 years, 90·7% (88·2–92·7) at 10 years, and 83·4% (79·7–86·4) at 15 years; and in the WBI group, the overall survival rate was 96·8% (95·1–97·9) at 5 years, 92·7% (90·4–94·4) at 10 years, and 82·4% (78·5–85·6) at 15 years. We did not collect long-term data on adverse events. Interpretation The long-term results of this trial confirmed the higher rate of IBTR in the ELIOT group than in the WBI group, without any differences in overall survival. ELIOT should be offered to selected patients at low-risk of IBTR. Funding Italian Association for Cancer Research, Jacqueline Seroussi Memorial Foundation for Cancer Research, Umberto Veronesi Foundation, American Italian Cancer Foundation, The Lombardy Region, and Italian Ministry of Health.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
无限鸵鸟完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
于胜男完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
ZS完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
日暮倚修竹完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
芝士椰果发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
耳机分你一只诺完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
陌上苏凉完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
Ava应助嘻嘻哈哈采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
积极凌兰完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
今后应助秀丽的小懒虫采纳,获得10
5秒前
hqlran完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
WX完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
未来完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
沉静傻姑发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
hoongyan完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
超级的幻然完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
mmol完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
gdh发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
哈哈完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
Jasper应助未来采纳,获得10
11秒前
12秒前
蓝色雪狐完成签到,获得积分20
12秒前
12秒前
淑儿哥哥发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
cch发布了新的文献求助30
13秒前
14秒前
孙元应助脆啵啵马克宝采纳,获得10
14秒前
14秒前
甜橙完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
16秒前
16秒前
高分求助中
2025-2031全球及中国金刚石触媒粉行业研究及十五五规划分析报告 12000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Cambridge History of China: Volume 4, Sui and T'ang China, 589–906 AD, Part Two 1000
The Composition and Relative Chronology of Dynasties 16 and 17 in Egypt 1000
Russian Foreign Policy: Change and Continuity 800
Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo By Jenine Beekhuyzen, Pat Bazeley · 2024 800
Translanguaging in Action in English-Medium Classrooms: A Resource Book for Teachers 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5695131
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5100385
关于积分的说明 15215391
捐赠科研通 4851561
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2602454
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1554227
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1512186