Intraoperative irradiation for early breast cancer (ELIOT): long-term recurrence and survival outcomes from a single-centre, randomised, phase 3 equivalence trial

医学 临床终点 放射治疗 乳腺癌 剂量分馏 临床试验 保乳手术 随机对照试验 内科学 外科 肿瘤科 癌症 乳房切除术
作者
Roberto Orecchia,Umberto Veronesi,Patrick Maisonneuve,Viviana Galimberti,Roberta Lazzari,Paolo Veronesi,Barbara Alicja Jereczek‐Fossa,Federica Cattani,Claudia Sangalli,Alberto Luini,Pietro Caldarella,Marco Venturino,Daniele Sances,Stefano Zurrida,Giuseppe Viale,Maria Cristina Leonardi,Mattia Intra
出处
期刊:Lancet Oncology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:22 (5): 597-608 被引量:161
标识
DOI:10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00080-2
摘要

Background In the randomised, phase 3 equivalence trial on electron intraoperative radiotherapy (ELIOT), accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) with the use of intraoperative radiotherapy was associated with a higher rate of ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence (IBTR) than whole-breast irradiation (WBI) in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Here, we aimed to examine the planned long-term recurrence and survival outcomes from the ELIOT trial. Methods This single-centre, randomised, phase 3 equivalence trial was done at the European Institute of Oncology (Milan, Italy). Eligible women, aged 48–75 years with a clinical diagnosis of a unicentric breast carcinoma with an ultrasound diameter not exceeding 25 mm, clinically negative axillary lymph nodes, and who were suitable for breast-conserving surgery, were randomly assigned (1:1) via a web-based system, with a random permuted block design (block size of 16) and stratified by clinical tumour size, to receive post-operative WBI with conventional fractionation (50 Gy given as 25 fractions of 2 Gy, plus a 10 Gy boost), or 21 Gy intraoperative radiotherapy with electrons (ELIOT) in a single dose to the tumour bed during surgery. The trial was open label and no-one was masked to treatment group assignment. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of IBTR. The trial was designed assuming a 5-year IBTR rate of 3% in the WBI group and equivalence of the two groups, if the 5-year IBTR rate in the ELIOT group did not exceed a 2·5 times excess, corresponding to 7·5%. Overall survival was the secondary endpoint. The main analysis was done by intention to treat. The cumulative incidence of IBTR events and overall survival were assessed at 5, 10, and 15 years of follow-up. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01849133. Findings Between Nov 20, 2000, and Dec 27, 2007, 1305 women were enrolled and randomly assigned: 654 to the WBI group and 651 to the ELIOT group. After a median follow-up of 12·4 years (IQR 9·7–14·7), 86 (7%) patients developed IBTR, with 70 (11%) cases in the ELIOT group and 16 (2%) in the WBI group, corresponding to an absolute excess of 54 IBTRs in the ELIOT group (HR 4·62, 95% CI 2·68–7·95, p<0·0001). In the ELIOT group, the 5-year IBTR rate was 4·2% (95% CI 2·8–5·9), the 10-year rate was 8·1% (6·1–10·3), and the 15-year rate was 12·6% (9·8–15·9). In the WBI group, the 5-year IBTR rate was 0·5% (95% CI 0·1–1·3), the 10-year rate was 1·1% (0·5–2·2), and the 15-year rate was 2·4% (1·4–4·0). At final follow-up on March 11, 2019, 193 (15%) women had died from any cause, with no difference between the two groups (98 deaths in the ELIOT group vs 95 in the WBI group; HR 1·03, 95% CI 0·77–1·36, p=0·85). In the ELIOT group, the overall survival rate was 96·8% (95% CI 95·1–97·9) at 5 years, 90·7% (88·2–92·7) at 10 years, and 83·4% (79·7–86·4) at 15 years; and in the WBI group, the overall survival rate was 96·8% (95·1–97·9) at 5 years, 92·7% (90·4–94·4) at 10 years, and 82·4% (78·5–85·6) at 15 years. We did not collect long-term data on adverse events. Interpretation The long-term results of this trial confirmed the higher rate of IBTR in the ELIOT group than in the WBI group, without any differences in overall survival. ELIOT should be offered to selected patients at low-risk of IBTR. Funding Italian Association for Cancer Research, Jacqueline Seroussi Memorial Foundation for Cancer Research, Umberto Veronesi Foundation, American Italian Cancer Foundation, The Lombardy Region, and Italian Ministry of Health.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Yyyyy完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
tp040900完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
烟花应助guojingjing采纳,获得10
4秒前
Yyyyy发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
傲娇如天发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
科研通AI6应助liaoliao采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
yang完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
cellzaizia完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
七七的小西西完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
wen发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
共享精神应助清脆的书桃采纳,获得10
10秒前
徐一航发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
所所应助举个栗子采纳,获得10
12秒前
7777777完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
Mono发布了新的文献求助30
12秒前
李冰洋完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
cellzaizia发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
13秒前
李李李完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
qing完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
慕青应助Dream采纳,获得10
16秒前
16秒前
研友_RLNXOZ完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
冷静梦之完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
科研小白_完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
me发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
浮游应助幽默的幻柏采纳,获得10
19秒前
田様应助徐一航采纳,获得10
20秒前
dds完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
xin发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
科研通AI6应助Qi采纳,获得10
21秒前
ASD完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
高分求助中
合成生物食品制造技术导则,团体标准,编号:T/CITS 396-2025 1000
The Leucovorin Guide for Parents: Understanding Autism’s Folate 1000
Pipeline and riser loss of containment 2001 - 2020 (PARLOC 2020) 1000
Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Learning and Your Life 4th Edition 500
Comparing natural with chemical additive production 500
Atlas of Liver Pathology: A Pattern-Based Approach 500
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 内科学 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 纳米技术 遗传学 基因 复合材料 化学工程 物理化学 病理 催化作用 免疫学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5241249
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4408034
关于积分的说明 13720910
捐赠科研通 4277007
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2346903
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1344015
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1302114