Intraoperative irradiation for early breast cancer (ELIOT): long-term recurrence and survival outcomes from a single-centre, randomised, phase 3 equivalence trial

医学 临床终点 放射治疗 乳腺癌 剂量分馏 临床试验 保乳手术 随机对照试验 内科学 外科 肿瘤科 癌症 乳房切除术
作者
Roberto Orecchia,Umberto Veronesi,Patrick Maisonneuve,Viviana Galimberti,Roberta Lazzari,Paolo Veronesi,Barbara Alicja Jereczek‐Fossa,Federica Cattani,Claudia Sangalli,Alberto Luini,Pietro Caldarella,Marco Venturino,Daniele Sances,Stefano Zurrida,Giuseppe Viale,Maria Cristina Leonardi,Mattia Intra
出处
期刊:Lancet Oncology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:22 (5): 597-608 被引量:161
标识
DOI:10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00080-2
摘要

Background In the randomised, phase 3 equivalence trial on electron intraoperative radiotherapy (ELIOT), accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) with the use of intraoperative radiotherapy was associated with a higher rate of ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence (IBTR) than whole-breast irradiation (WBI) in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Here, we aimed to examine the planned long-term recurrence and survival outcomes from the ELIOT trial. Methods This single-centre, randomised, phase 3 equivalence trial was done at the European Institute of Oncology (Milan, Italy). Eligible women, aged 48–75 years with a clinical diagnosis of a unicentric breast carcinoma with an ultrasound diameter not exceeding 25 mm, clinically negative axillary lymph nodes, and who were suitable for breast-conserving surgery, were randomly assigned (1:1) via a web-based system, with a random permuted block design (block size of 16) and stratified by clinical tumour size, to receive post-operative WBI with conventional fractionation (50 Gy given as 25 fractions of 2 Gy, plus a 10 Gy boost), or 21 Gy intraoperative radiotherapy with electrons (ELIOT) in a single dose to the tumour bed during surgery. The trial was open label and no-one was masked to treatment group assignment. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of IBTR. The trial was designed assuming a 5-year IBTR rate of 3% in the WBI group and equivalence of the two groups, if the 5-year IBTR rate in the ELIOT group did not exceed a 2·5 times excess, corresponding to 7·5%. Overall survival was the secondary endpoint. The main analysis was done by intention to treat. The cumulative incidence of IBTR events and overall survival were assessed at 5, 10, and 15 years of follow-up. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01849133. Findings Between Nov 20, 2000, and Dec 27, 2007, 1305 women were enrolled and randomly assigned: 654 to the WBI group and 651 to the ELIOT group. After a median follow-up of 12·4 years (IQR 9·7–14·7), 86 (7%) patients developed IBTR, with 70 (11%) cases in the ELIOT group and 16 (2%) in the WBI group, corresponding to an absolute excess of 54 IBTRs in the ELIOT group (HR 4·62, 95% CI 2·68–7·95, p<0·0001). In the ELIOT group, the 5-year IBTR rate was 4·2% (95% CI 2·8–5·9), the 10-year rate was 8·1% (6·1–10·3), and the 15-year rate was 12·6% (9·8–15·9). In the WBI group, the 5-year IBTR rate was 0·5% (95% CI 0·1–1·3), the 10-year rate was 1·1% (0·5–2·2), and the 15-year rate was 2·4% (1·4–4·0). At final follow-up on March 11, 2019, 193 (15%) women had died from any cause, with no difference between the two groups (98 deaths in the ELIOT group vs 95 in the WBI group; HR 1·03, 95% CI 0·77–1·36, p=0·85). In the ELIOT group, the overall survival rate was 96·8% (95% CI 95·1–97·9) at 5 years, 90·7% (88·2–92·7) at 10 years, and 83·4% (79·7–86·4) at 15 years; and in the WBI group, the overall survival rate was 96·8% (95·1–97·9) at 5 years, 92·7% (90·4–94·4) at 10 years, and 82·4% (78·5–85·6) at 15 years. We did not collect long-term data on adverse events. Interpretation The long-term results of this trial confirmed the higher rate of IBTR in the ELIOT group than in the WBI group, without any differences in overall survival. ELIOT should be offered to selected patients at low-risk of IBTR. Funding Italian Association for Cancer Research, Jacqueline Seroussi Memorial Foundation for Cancer Research, Umberto Veronesi Foundation, American Italian Cancer Foundation, The Lombardy Region, and Italian Ministry of Health.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
贱小贱完成签到,获得积分0
刚刚
刚刚
天选发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
晓雅发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
毗昙应助复杂的妙柏采纳,获得10
1秒前
Li818完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
orixero应助学术牛马采纳,获得10
1秒前
小包发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
小小完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
hyw发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
高高惮完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
大力秀完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
sxm1004完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
Franky发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
liu完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
万能图书馆应助嗯哼哈哈采纳,获得10
6秒前
Clemence应助爱科研采纳,获得10
7秒前
铁妹完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
懵懂的芫完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
whereistheend完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
华仔应助dvdcvvds采纳,获得10
7秒前
8秒前
晓军发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
子卿发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
9秒前
yjh123应助爱喝酸奶的天真采纳,获得30
9秒前
fairyinn完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
mashengzhe完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
情怀应助失眠若血采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
万能图书馆应助yywww采纳,获得10
10秒前
独行独行发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
Asun完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
田様应助我是神呆呆采纳,获得10
11秒前
高分求助中
Markov Chain Monte Carlo 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Common Foundations of American and East Asian Modernisation: From Alexander Hamilton to Junichero Koizumi 1000
Weaponeering: An Introduction Fourth Edition, Volume 1 1000
Advanced Weaponeering Fourth Edition, Volume 2 1000
Evidence Summary. Injection (subcutaneous):op- timal administration 1000
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7501018
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9091382
关于积分的说明 19395486
捐赠科研通 7110609
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3250805
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2420227
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2236804