作者
Paul Arnold,Kathleen D. Askland,Cristina Barlassina,Laura Bellodi,O. Joseph Bienvenu,Donald W. Black,Michael H. Bloch,Helena Brentani,Christie L. Burton,Beatríz Camarena,Carolina Cappi,Daniëlle C. Cath,Maria Cristina Cavallini,David V. Conti,Edwin H. Cook,Vladimir Coric,Bernadette Cullen,D. Cusi,Lea K. Davis,Richard Delorme,Damiaan Denys,Eske M. Derks,Valsamma Eapen,Christopher K. Edlund,Lauren Erdman,Peter Falkai,Martijn Figee,Abigail J. Fyer,Daniel Geller,Fernando S. Goes,Hans J. Grabe,Marco A. Grados,Benjamin D. Greenberg,Edna Grünblatt,Wei Guo,Gregory L. Hanna,Sian Hemmings,Ana Gabriela Hounie,Michael Jenicke,Clare L. Keenan,James L. Kennedy,Ekaterina A. Khramtsova,Anuar Konkashbaev,James A. Knowles,Janice Krasnow,Cristophe Lange,Nuria Lanzagorta,Marion Leboyer,Leonhard Lennertz,Bingbin Li,Kung‐Yee Liang,Christine Löchner,Fabìo Macciardi,Brion S. Maher,Wolfgang Maier,Maurizio Marconi,Carol A. Mathews,Manuel Matthesien,James T. McCracken,Nicole McLaughlin,Eurípedes Constantino Miguel,Rainald Moessner,Dennis L. Murphy,Benjamin M. Neale,Gerald Nestadt,Paul S. Nestadt,Humberto Nicolini,E. L. Nurmi,Lisa Osiecki,David L. Pauls,John Piacentini,Daniëlle Posthuma,Ann E. Pulver,Haide Qin,Steven A. Rasmussen,Scott L. Rauch,Margaret A. Richter,Mark A. Riddle,Stephan Ripke,Stephan Ruhrmann,Aline Santos Sampaio,Jack Samuels,Jeremiah M. Scharf,Yin Yao Shugart,Jan Smit,Dan J. Stein,S. Evelyn Stewart,M. Turiel,Homero Vallada,Jeremy Veenstra‐VanderWeele,Michael Wagner,Susanne Walitza,Y. Wang,Jens R. Wendland,Nienke Vulink,Dongmei Yu,Gwyneth Zai
摘要
Two obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have been published by independent OCD consortia, the International Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Foundation Genetics Collaborative (IOCDF-GC) and the OCD Collaborative Genetics Association Study (OCGAS), but many of the top-ranked signals were supported in only one study. We therefore conducted a meta-analysis from the two consortia, investigating a total of 2688 individuals of European ancestry with OCD and 7037 genomically matched controls. No single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) reached genome-wide significance. However, in comparison with the two individual GWASs, the distribution of P-values shifted toward significance. The top haplotypic blocks were tagged with rs4733767 (P=7.1 × 10−7; odds ratio (OR)=1.21; confidence interval (CI): 1.12–1.31, CASC8/CASC11), rs1030757 (P=1.1 × 10−6; OR=1.18; CI: 1.10–1.26, GRID2) and rs12504244 (P=1.6 × 10−6; OR=1.18; CI: 1.11–1.27, KIT). Variants located in or near the genes ASB13, RSPO4, DLGAP1, PTPRD, GRIK2, FAIM2 and CDH20, identified in linkage peaks and the original GWASs, were among the top signals. Polygenic risk scores for each individual study predicted case–control status in the other by explaining 0.9% (P=0.003) and 0.3% (P=0.0009) of the phenotypic variance in OCGAS and the European IOCDF-GC target samples, respectively. The common SNP heritability in the combined OCGAS and IOCDF-GC sample was estimated to be 0.28 (s.e.=0.04). Strikingly, ∼65% of the SNP-based heritability in the OCGAS sample was accounted for by SNPs with minor allele frequencies of ⩾40%. This joint analysis constituting the largest single OCD genome-wide study to date represents a major integrative step in elucidating the genetic causes of OCD.